Senior lawyers call for respecting judiciary
Senior lawyers on Wednesday voiced concerns over the reported objectionable remarks by members of the Sindh Bar Council (SBC) against the judiciary, and said the lawyers’ community would not support the council or any other such body if they went beyond their charter and mandate.
Addressing a press conference at the Sindh High Court, senior lawyers, including Shakeel Ahmed, Rana Azeem, Sohail Hameed and SM Altaf, said certain members of the council held a press conference, which was reported in a section of press, in which they claimed that the judiciary was rendering questionable and unpopular decisions.
They said these remarks were in utter denial of one of the major roles of the bar council to uphold and vindicate the dignity and independence of the judiciary. They said the SBC was a statutory body under the Legal Practitioners and Bar Council Act and was obligated to adhere to its mandate in all circumstances.
They said the lawyers would not support the SBC or any other such body if they went beyond their charter and limit or if they indulged in any activity or assumed a role which was not covered by its mandate. They said the legal fraternity would strongly resist any subversion on the part of any official or member of the council.
They said the rights guaranteed under the constitution and the law could not be achieved by the people until the establishment of a corruption-free society. They appreciated the judiciary and said the judiciary was rightly performing its constitutional functions, and that was causing annoyance to certain elements which were raising a hue and cry in the parliament and in public meetings.
They expressed serious concern over the derogatory remarks by politicians, including ministers and senators, against the judiciary in public meetings, press conferences and TV talk shows.
They urged the SBC members to refrain from making such utterances as were published in a section of the press so that things did not lead to any confrontation between the bench and the bar. They resolved that the lawyers would not be a party to any campaign against the judiciary.
-
First Poll Since King Charles' Action Against Andrew Reveals Royal Family's Public Standing -
Blake Lively Strengthens Legal Team Ahead Of Justin Baldoni Trial -
'Back To School!': Palace Shares Details Of Princess Anne's Latest Engagements -
Paul Mescal Clarifies Acting Break Comment As He Teases Paul McCartney Role -
Kate Middleton's Unexpected Style Of Arrival At Solo Outing Goes Viral -
Why ‘X’ Is Down? Thousands Report Twitter Outage: Here’s What You Can Do -
Florida Man Held After Alleged Nail-scattering On Busy Intersections -
Valeria Nicov: Sean Penn's Athletic Girlfriend Raises Eyebrows With Latest Photos -
Sharon Stone Lashes Out At Fellow Award Show Attendees After Stealing Accusations -
Gwyneth Paltrow Reveals Real Reason She Said Yes To 'Marty Supreme' -
King Charles Says He And Queen Camilla Stand With People Of Ukraine -
Ben Affleck Argues In Favour Of His Shirtless Scene In 'The Rip' -
Mississippi Postal Worker Arrested After Complaints Of Marijuana Odour In Letters -
Canada, China Lock Initial Trade Deal On ‘EV,Canola’ To Strengthen Ties: What To Expect Next? -
Melissa Leo On Euphoria Of Winning An Oscar Vs It's Impact On Career -
Meghan Markle, Prince Harry Express 'hope' In Latest Major Statement