Senior lawyers call for respecting judiciary
Senior lawyers on Wednesday voiced concerns over the reported objectionable remarks by members of the Sindh Bar Council (SBC) against the judiciary, and said the lawyers’ community would not support the council or any other such body if they went beyond their charter and mandate.
Addressing a press conference at the Sindh High Court, senior lawyers, including Shakeel Ahmed, Rana Azeem, Sohail Hameed and SM Altaf, said certain members of the council held a press conference, which was reported in a section of press, in which they claimed that the judiciary was rendering questionable and unpopular decisions.
They said these remarks were in utter denial of one of the major roles of the bar council to uphold and vindicate the dignity and independence of the judiciary. They said the SBC was a statutory body under the Legal Practitioners and Bar Council Act and was obligated to adhere to its mandate in all circumstances.
They said the lawyers would not support the SBC or any other such body if they went beyond their charter and limit or if they indulged in any activity or assumed a role which was not covered by its mandate. They said the legal fraternity would strongly resist any subversion on the part of any official or member of the council.
They said the rights guaranteed under the constitution and the law could not be achieved by the people until the establishment of a corruption-free society. They appreciated the judiciary and said the judiciary was rightly performing its constitutional functions, and that was causing annoyance to certain elements which were raising a hue and cry in the parliament and in public meetings.
They expressed serious concern over the derogatory remarks by politicians, including ministers and senators, against the judiciary in public meetings, press conferences and TV talk shows.
They urged the SBC members to refrain from making such utterances as were published in a section of the press so that things did not lead to any confrontation between the bench and the bar. They resolved that the lawyers would not be a party to any campaign against the judiciary.
-
Canucks Defeated 6-2 By Lightning In Vancouver As Visitors Dominate At Rogers Arena -
Kylie Jenner’s Ex-assistant Recalls The Breaking Point Behind Her Exit: 'I Don't Want To Go Get Your Laptop' -
Olivia Rodrigo Finally Breaks Silence On Sabrina Carpenter Feud -
AI To Disrupt 300m Jobs Over Next Decade, Goldman Sachs Predicts -
OpenAI’s Desktop ‘superapp’ Could Transform How Users Interact With AI -
Canada, And Allies Vow Action To Restore Safe Passage Through The Strait Of Hormuz -
Christina Aguilera Sparks Outrage With Mexico Remarks At Her Show -
Shonda Rhimes Breaks Silence On Eric Dane's Snub From 2026 Oscars' In Memoriam -
'Love Island USA' Star Alana Paolucci Announces Engagement To Sebastian Sartor: 'Best Birthday Trip Ever' -
Trump 24-karat Gold Coin Wins Approval From Hand-picked Federal Panel: How The Treasury Bypassed Currency Law? -
AI Boom At Risk As Oil Prices Surge: WTO -
Donald Trump’s Pearl Harbor Comment To Japan’s Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi Draws Attention -
Merriam-Webster Sues OpenAI Over ChatGPT Training Data -
Oven Recalls Issued For Frigidaire Models In Canada After Injuries Linked To Burn Risk -
Ubisoft Cuts 105 Jobs At Red Storm Entertainment As Game Development Work Comes To An End -
Stevie Young AC/DC Star Urgently Hospitalized Ahead Of Upcoming Show