SC verdict has no bearing on Nawaz’s disqualification limit: Tarar
On Wednesday, full court sustained the SC Practice, Procedure Act 2023, and dismissed petitions against it
ISLAMABAD: Former law minister Azam Nazeer Tarar has said that the Supreme Court’s verdict on the SC (Practice and Procedure) Act will have no bearing on former prime minister and PML-N supremo Nawaz Sharif’s disqualification limit as the recently-amended election laws reduced the ineligibility period to five years with retrospective effect.
The statement from the senior PML-N leader came following reports claiming that the apex court verdict had closed the doors for electoral politics for the former premier as it struck down a section dealing with the retrospective effect of law.
On Wednesday, the full court sustained the SC Practice and Procedure Act 2023, and dismissed the petitions against it. However, it declared, by a majority of 8 to 7, sub-section (2) of section 5 of the Act (granting a right of appeal retrospectively) to be ultra vires the constitution.
After the announcement of the verdict, several legal experts had said that it made matters complicated for Nawaz Sharif’s political future.
Responding to these claims, Tarar — a key member of the party’s legal team who had held consultative meetings with Nawaz Sharif in London before his departure to Pakistan — said that an amendment was made in the Elections Act, 2017 limiting disqualification to five years. Talking to Geo, he said that: “The law says that wherever the constitution is silent, the issue can be addressed through legislation and after the said amendment in the election laws, all those people, including Nawaz Sharif, who were disqualified for life are now eligible to contest polls.”
Tarar hailed the verdict and said that the top court had acknowledged parliament’s legislative competence and strengthened the legislature. He also demanded to fill all the posts of the judges vacant in the Supreme Court and high courts.
In 2017, the Supreme Court had disqualified Nawaz from holding public office for life not having declared a receivable salary.
-
Can AI Bully Humans? Bot Publicly Criticises Engineer After Code Rejection -
Search For Savannah Guthrie’s Abducted Mom Enters Unthinkable Phase -
Imagine Dragons Star, Dan Reynolds Recalls 'frustrating' Diagnosis -
Steve Jobs Once Called Google Over Single Shade Of Yellow: Here’s Why -
Barack Obama Addresses UFO Mystery: Aliens Are ‘real’ But Debunks Area 51 Conspiracy Theories -
Selma Blair Explains Why Multiple Sclerosis 'isn't So Scary' -
Will Smith Surprises Wife Jada Pinkett With Unusual Gift On Valentine's Day -
Shamed Andrew Has Paid Royal Favours With ‘national Scandal’ -
Prince William Ticked Off By How Andrew ‘behaved With Staff’ -
Prince William Questions Himself ‘what’s The Point’ After Saudi Trip -
James Van Der Beek's Friends Helped Fund Ranch Purchase Before His Death At 48 -
King Charles ‘very Much’ Wants Andrew To Testify At US Congress -
Rosie O’Donnell Secretly Returned To US To Test Safety -
Meghan Markle, Prince Harry Spotted On Date Night On Valentine’s Day -
King Charles Butler Spills Valentine’s Day Dinner Blunders -
Brooklyn Beckham Hits Back At Gordon Ramsay With Subtle Move Over Remark On His Personal Life