SC verdict has no bearing on Nawaz’s disqualification limit: Tarar
On Wednesday, full court sustained the SC Practice, Procedure Act 2023, and dismissed petitions against it
ISLAMABAD: Former law minister Azam Nazeer Tarar has said that the Supreme Court’s verdict on the SC (Practice and Procedure) Act will have no bearing on former prime minister and PML-N supremo Nawaz Sharif’s disqualification limit as the recently-amended election laws reduced the ineligibility period to five years with retrospective effect.
The statement from the senior PML-N leader came following reports claiming that the apex court verdict had closed the doors for electoral politics for the former premier as it struck down a section dealing with the retrospective effect of law.
On Wednesday, the full court sustained the SC Practice and Procedure Act 2023, and dismissed the petitions against it. However, it declared, by a majority of 8 to 7, sub-section (2) of section 5 of the Act (granting a right of appeal retrospectively) to be ultra vires the constitution.
After the announcement of the verdict, several legal experts had said that it made matters complicated for Nawaz Sharif’s political future.
Responding to these claims, Tarar — a key member of the party’s legal team who had held consultative meetings with Nawaz Sharif in London before his departure to Pakistan — said that an amendment was made in the Elections Act, 2017 limiting disqualification to five years. Talking to Geo, he said that: “The law says that wherever the constitution is silent, the issue can be addressed through legislation and after the said amendment in the election laws, all those people, including Nawaz Sharif, who were disqualified for life are now eligible to contest polls.”
Tarar hailed the verdict and said that the top court had acknowledged parliament’s legislative competence and strengthened the legislature. He also demanded to fill all the posts of the judges vacant in the Supreme Court and high courts.
In 2017, the Supreme Court had disqualified Nawaz from holding public office for life not having declared a receivable salary.
-
Pooh Shiesty, His Father Arrested Over Gucci Mane Kidnapping -
Blake Lively 'devastated' After Legal Loss Against Justin Baldoni -
Queen Elizabeth Ignored Warning Signs In Andrew Case To Protect Him? -
'Hollyoaks' Star Keiron Richardson Confirms Speculation About Major Character Exit -
King Charles, Harry Reconciliation: Royal Expert Reflects On 'work Going On Behind The Scenes' -
Palace Shares Rare Update On King Charles’ State Visit To See Donald Trump -
Garth Brooks's Comeback Fear Exposes Deeper Dependence After Rape Accusations -
SpaceX Kicks Off IPO Process, Eyes Record $75 Billion Offering -
Where Dak Prescott And Sarah Jane Ramos Stand About Their Relationship As Canceled Wedding Nears -
Sarah Ferguson To Come On ‘Traitors’ Or ‘Big Brother’? Plans Come To Light -
Misua, 'Drag Race: Philippines,' Breathes Her Last At 27 -
US Targets China Chip Sector With New Export Curbs On ASML -
Kelly Ripa Makes Bombshell Confession About Pregnancy After 23 Years -
King Charles True Feelings Show 'thawing' Relations With Eugenie And Beatrice Amid Andrew Scandal -
Trump Administration Labeled ‘misogynistic’ Following Dismissal Of Pam Bondi And Kristi Noem -
Trump Mocks Starmer As UK–US Tensions Rise Over Defence