Delhi court rejects plea seeking ban on beef, cow slaughter
NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court has dismissed a plea seeking to ban cow slaughter and the sale of beef in the national capital region, Indian media reported on Friday.
Filed by Swami Satyananda Chakradhari, a man claiming to be a monk, the plea sought the Delhi government to enact a law similar to the one in Indian Occupied Jammu and
By GEO ENGLISH
November 06, 2015
NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court has dismissed a plea seeking to ban cow slaughter and the sale of beef in the national capital region, Indian media reported on Friday.
Filed by Swami Satyananda Chakradhari, a man claiming to be a monk, the plea sought the Delhi government to enact a law similar to the one in Indian Occupied Jammu and Kashmir, which penalizes the slaughter of bovine animals with 10 years imprisonment and financial penalty.
A bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Jayant Nath declined to entertain the plea after the Delhi government – led by the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) – informed the court that a law, the 'Delhi Agricultural Cattle Preservation Act', already exists to protect cattle.
A counsel for the state government told the court that the petition was a publicity stunt and should be dismissed with exemplary cost.
"The writ petition is misconceived and same is dismissed," the bench said, taking note of the submissions of Delhi government's counsel. The court further observed that it cannot issue orders to the state government to enact any laws.
Filed by Swami Satyananda Chakradhari, a man claiming to be a monk, the plea sought the Delhi government to enact a law similar to the one in Indian Occupied Jammu and Kashmir, which penalizes the slaughter of bovine animals with 10 years imprisonment and financial penalty.
A bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Jayant Nath declined to entertain the plea after the Delhi government – led by the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) – informed the court that a law, the 'Delhi Agricultural Cattle Preservation Act', already exists to protect cattle.
A counsel for the state government told the court that the petition was a publicity stunt and should be dismissed with exemplary cost.
"The writ petition is misconceived and same is dismissed," the bench said, taking note of the submissions of Delhi government's counsel. The court further observed that it cannot issue orders to the state government to enact any laws.
-
Poll reveals majority of Americans' views on Bad Bunny
-
Man convicted after DNA links him to 20-year-old rape case
-
California cop accused of using bogus 911 calls to reach ex-partner
-
'Elderly' nanny arrested by ICE outside employer's home, freed after judge's order
-
key details from Germany's multimillion-euro heist revealed
-
Search for Savannah Guthrie’s abducted mom enters unthinkable phase
-
Barack Obama addresses UFO mystery: Aliens are ‘real’ but debunks Area 51 conspiracy theories
-
Rosie O’Donnell secretly returned to US to test safety