World
The high court in Indian Occupied Kashmir has ruled that Jammu and Kashmir retained limited sovereignty and did not merge with the Dominion of India after partition in 1947.
Kashmir never merged with India, rules IOK high court
The high court in Indian Occupied Kashmir has ruled that Jammu and Kashmir retained limited sovereignty and did not merge with the Dominion of India after partition in 1947.
In its historic verdict last week, the high court ruled that the Article 370 of the Indian Constitution is “a permanent provision” and “cannot be abrogated, repealed or even amended”.
Under the
By GEO ENGLISH
Published October 16, 2015
The high court in Indian Occupied Kashmir has ruled that Jammu and Kashmir retained limited sovereignty and did not merge with the Dominion of India after partition in 1947.
In its historic verdict last week, the high court ruled that the Article 370 of the Indian Constitution is “a permanent provision” and “cannot be abrogated, repealed or even amended”.
Under the Indian constitution, Article 370 grants special status to the disputed state of Jammu and Kashmir.
“It (Article 370) is beyond amendment, repeal or abrogation, in as much as Constituent Assembly of the State before its dissolution did not recommend its Amendment or repeal,” bench said in its verdict.
The court added that Article 35A gives “protection” to existing laws in force in the state.
“No other provision of the Constitution as provided under Article 370 (1), would be applicable to the State except, by Presidential order in consultation with the State in case the provision is akin to subjects delineated in Instrument of Accession and with concurrence of the State, in case it does not fall within ambit of Instrument of Accession,” the court said.
In its historic verdict last week, the high court ruled that the Article 370 of the Indian Constitution is “a permanent provision” and “cannot be abrogated, repealed or even amended”.
Under the Indian constitution, Article 370 grants special status to the disputed state of Jammu and Kashmir.
“It (Article 370) is beyond amendment, repeal or abrogation, in as much as Constituent Assembly of the State before its dissolution did not recommend its Amendment or repeal,” bench said in its verdict.
The court added that Article 35A gives “protection” to existing laws in force in the state.
“No other provision of the Constitution as provided under Article 370 (1), would be applicable to the State except, by Presidential order in consultation with the State in case the provision is akin to subjects delineated in Instrument of Accession and with concurrence of the State, in case it does not fall within ambit of Instrument of Accession,” the court said.
-
New Covid variant BA.3.2 spreads across US as experts stress vigilance
-
Savannah Guthrie receives secret message as search for Nancy continues
-
Daylight saving ends in Australia: When clocks go back in April 2026
-
China develops AI VF tools to raise birth rates
-
Vanessa Trump sparks fans reactions as she rejects rumours of rift with Tiger Woods
-
Tragedy at Peru football derby: One dead, 47 injured in rally at Alejandro Villanueva Stadium
-
Where Vanessa Trump stands with Tiger Woods amid DUI drama
-
NASA Artemis II moon mission captures stunning Earth images during historic lunar journey
-
Canadian citizenship new eligibility rules explained: who qualifies and what has changed
-
A10 Warthog hit as US jet downed in Iran, one crew rescued and search underway for second
-
Meningococcal disease, dangerous bacterial infection, hits decade high in Canada
-
Sam Altman's OpenAI buys TBPN to expand communication strategy and shape AI public debate