LONDON: Boris Johnson’s decision to suspend parliament is a political issue and not a matter for judges, a lawyer for the prime minister said on Wednesday as he sought to persuade the British Supreme Court that the five-week shutdown was lawful. Johnson asked Queen Elizabeth to prorogue, or suspend, parliament from Sept. 10 until Oct. 14, prompting accusations from opponents that he wanted to silence the legislature in the run-up to Britain’s exit from the European Union on Oct. 31. The Supreme Court, Britain’s top judicial body, began three days of hearings on Tuesday to decide whether Johnson’s advice to the queen regarding the suspension was unlawful.
A ruling against him would be a major embarrassment for Johnson, who has no majority in parliament, and could see lawmakers returning early, with more time to try to influence his Brexit plans.
James Eadie, a lawyer for Johnson, told the court he would produce a written document on Thursday outlining what Johnson would do if he lost. Another government lawyer said on Tuesday that if Johnson lost the case, he could recall parliament earlier than planned.
Outlining Johnson’s case, Eadie said the ability to prorogue parliament was a matter of politics or “high policy” which was non-justiciable, meaning it was not something on which judges could rule.
IST would launch a student cube satellite ‘ICUBE-Qamar’ into the lunar orbit aboard China’s Chang’E-6 Mission...
PTCL said that it is “diligently examining this order within the applicable legal and regulatory framework”.
Russia’s defence minister ordered a hike in weapons production and said deliveries needed to be faster for the war...
US accused Russia of violating international chemical weapons ban by deploying the choking agent chloropicrin against...
Establishment Division started process for pre-qualification on headhunting firms to hire experts and professionals in...
Terrorists launched an attack at the Hazrat Umar Farooq Jhangi check-post near Taunsa Sharif on Tuesday midnight