ISLAMABAD: Expressing annoyance at the attitude of Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) to adjourn hearing into appeal against the acquittal of Shoaib Sheikh, Chief Executive of Axact, Justice Athar Minallah of Islamabad High Court (IHC) remarked that the court was giving them last chance and they would not be given adjournment next time.
Justice Athar Minallah issued these remarks during hearing into an appeal of FIA against acquittal of Axact Chief Executive Shoaib Sheikh in fake degree case on Monday. He said that the attitude of FIA would be brought to the notice of Supreme Court if it continued the same in future. The court summoned copy of the orders of Supreme Court in connection with Axact case from deputy attorney general.
IHC Division Bench comprising Justice Athar Minallah, lead judge and Justice Mian Gul Hassan Aurangzeb held the hearing. When the hearing started an associate of Hamid Ali Shah, private counsel for FIA, told the court that senior counsel could not appear in the court due to engagement in Supreme Court, therefore hearing should be adjourned. Justice Athar Minallah asked him where the copy of order of the Supreme Court was. At this, the counsel said that he did not carry that copy. Justice Athar Minallah said that it seemed that FIA was not serious about its case, while Supreme Court had ordered to dispose of this case in a definite period.
The court deferred the hearing of FIA’s appeal till March 12 with the order that no adjournment would be given on next time.
The Khalistan Referendum voting campaign is being organised under the supervision of the independent Punjab Referendum...
Aramco’s acquisition indicates a significant milestone in Pakistan’s energy sector
It is estimated that over 1 million tablets of the drug are sold illegally in Pakistan
Speaker Sardar Ayaz Sadiq said consensus on chairmanship of standing committees had not been reached so far despite...
The interior minister visited the passport office in Garden Town and addressed the issues faced by people in obtaining...
The petitioner questioned as to whether interference, direct or indirect, of any sort in the judicial work of a judge...