THE HAGUE: The United Nations´ top court said on Friday it had jurisdiction to rule in most parts of a case brought by Ukraine over Russia´s brutal 2022 invasion, with Kyiv urging reparations.
Ukraine dragged Russia before the International Court of Justice only a few days after the invasion, seeking to battle its neighbour on all fronts, legal as well as diplomatic and military.
When Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered the invasion on February 24, 2022, part of his argument was that pro-Russian people in eastern Ukraine had been “subjected to bullying and genocide by the Kyiv regime”.
Ukraine filed a suit at the ICJ, “emphatically denying” this and arguing that Russia´s use of “genocide” as a pretext for invasion went against the 1948 UN Genocide Convention.
In a preliminary ruling in March 2022, the ICJ sided with Ukraine and ordered Russia to halt its invasion immediately.
But Russia objected to this judgement, saying the ICJ, which decides on disputes between states, had no legal right to decide in this case.
The ICJ on Friday tossed out Moscow´s argument, saying it did have jurisdiction to rule on this.
However, Ukraine had also said in its submission that Russia´s use of force during the invasion was itself in contravention of the Genocide Convention.
The ICJ said it did not have competence to decide on this part of the case.
The court also said it did not have the power to rule on another point raised by Ukraine -- that Moscow´s recognition of the separatist regions of Lugansk and Donetsk breached the Convention.
The ICJ´s rulings are binding and cannot be appealed but it has no means to enforce its decisions.
The court noted that it had already ordered Russia to “immediately suspend” its military operations but that “the armed conflict continues to this day.”
Thirty-two allies of Ukraine also argued in support of Kyiv. The ICJ dismissed a bid by the United States to join the case.
The ICJ ruled on Wednesday in a separate case filed by Ukraine alleging that Russia financially backed separatist rebels in eastern Ukraine for years before the invasion.
The court mainly sided with Russia in that case, tossing out most of Ukraine´s requests and saying that Moscow had only failed to investigate possible breaches of terrorism financing law.
