Imran can no longer remain PTI chief: lawyer
Zulfiqar Bhutta says the loss of party office results from SC verdict on PTI’s own plea against Nawaz
ISLAMABAD: Zulfiqar Ahmad Bhutta, the eminent lawyer of the Supreme Court, has said that the fate of Imran Khan as party chairman has been sealed after the sentence in the Toshakhana corruption case.
In his reaction, he said the judgment had been made by the Supreme Court on a constitutional petition filed by his own party in the past. “He will not be able to maintain his position as the chairman of his political party due to his involvement. Imran Khan’s status as PTI chairman has ended automatically in the light of the Supreme Court decision in PLD 366/2018 (Zulfiqar Ahmad Bhutta, PTI, PPP, Sheikh Rasheed Ahmad, Jamaat-e-Islami) etc. vs. Federation of Pakistan case).
He said that he had filed a petition under Article 184(3) of the Constitution in the Supreme Court after the conviction of former Prime Minister Mian Nawaz Sharif in the Panama Papers Case, that a person who has been found guilty by a constitutional court and convicted, if he is the head of a political party, he should also be disqualified from being the head of the party, otherwise, despite being convicted, he will continue to play a role in politics and he will control his party. Election tickets will be issued to the candidates only with his signatures and on the letter written by him to the Election Commission, the defecting members of his party can also be disqualified.
“After my application was filed, 15 parties including PTI chief Imran Khan and his right-hand man Sheikh Rasheed, PPP and Jamaat-e-Islami etc. also filed constitutional petitions based on the same request. Later, a three-member bench headed by Chief Justice Saqib Nisar and comprising Justice Umar Ata Bandial and Justice Ijaz-ul-Ahsan issued a decision after hearing the Supreme Court PLD 366/2018 Zulfiqar Ahmad Bhutta et al that a person found guilty cannot be the head of any political party. “Imran Khan and Sheikh Rasheed used to come personally to the Supreme Court because of their interest in pursuing the case,” he added.
-
Why Prince Philip Could Not Be In Same Room As Sarah Ferguson -
US-Iran Agreed On Principal Deal To Open Strait Of Hormuz In Landmark Negotiations -
Lisa Ann Walter Shares Excitement About Her New Comedy Show 'It Was An Accident' -
Princess Beatrice, Princess Eugenie Grateful For Royal Inclusion Despite Woes -
Phil Collins Gives Hopeful Update After Years Of Serious Health Problems -
Nobel Peace Laureate Maria Corina Machado To Return Venezuela For 2026 Presidential Run -
Meghan Markle And Princess Catherine Divide Reignited After New Family Images -
Manchester United: Bruno Fernandes Breaks All-time Assist Record In Premier League -
Force Strikes Back As 'The Mandalorian And Grogu' Hauls Jaw-dropping Box Office Figure -
Katie Price Posts Late-night Messages While Lee Andrews Remains Unaccounted For -
Nancy Guthrie Update: Spotlight On Savannah Guthrie's Mom Past Newsroom Life -
China Launches Three-crew Spaceflight As Part Of 'Shenzhou-23 Mission' -
Kim Kardashian Once Warned Drake On Social Media Over Family 'threats' -
AI Version Of Iconic ‘Moonrise’ Photo Sparks Rights Backlash -
Sebastian Stan Drops Three-word Reaction For Terrifying Two-Face Look In 'The Batman Part II' -
Nvidia AI Chief Reveals How To Get Past Automated Hiring Systems