ISLAMABAD: Pakistan on Saturday reaffirmed its strong commitment to ‘One China Policy’ as it responded to Taiwan’s presidential election.
Pakistan has a “consistent, clear and principled” policy regarding Taiwan which is an “inalienable part of People’s Republic of China”, a statement from the Foreign Office read.
“Pakistan adheres to One China Policy, and calls for non-interference in the domestic affairs of all countries as per principles and objectives enshrined in the UN Charter,” it concluded.
The development came after William Lai Ching-te of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was declared winner in Taiwan's presidential election despite China's warnings not to support him.
During his victory address, Lai promised to protect Taiwan from Chinese aggression while also preserving peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait.
Beijing, which labelled Lai a "severe danger" prior to the ballot and advised voters to avoid him, declared that the outcome would not halt "the inevitable trend of China's reunification."
Responding to Lai’s win, Beijing’s Taiwan Affairs Office spokesperson Chen Binhua said in a statement carried by state news agency Xinhua that “Taiwan is China’s Taiwan”.
“Our stance on resolving the Taiwan question and realising national ‘reunification’ remains consistent, and our determination is as firm as a rock,” it said.
The statement said China would adhere to the one-China principle and firmly oppose the separatist activities aimed at “Taiwan independence” as well as “foreign interference”.
IG Islamabad seeks time for searching missing brothers, saying police trying best for their recovery
UAE police recently issued a warning to residents to refrain from giving money to beggars
Hot and dry winds expected to blow from northwest in morning hours in metropolis
President Zardari labels those responsible as country's enemies, PM orders provision of medical facilities to injured
During Eid ul Fitr holidays, most parts of the country to experience hot and dry weather
Defence minister says political criticism should be based on ideological differences rather than personal attacks