Refugee crisis
Desperate refugees crammed into cockle-shell boats landing on the shingle beaches of the south Kent coast are easily portrayed as invaders. Anti-immigrant demonstrators were exploiting such fears last weekend as they blockaded the main highway into Dover Port in order “to protect Britain’s borders”. Meanwhile, the home secretary, Priti Patel, blames the French for not doing enough to stop the flow of refugees across the Channel.
Refugees attract much attention on the last highly visible stages of their journeys between France and Britain. But there is absurdly little interest in why they endure such hardships, risking detention or death.
There is an instinctive assumption in the west that it is perfectly natural for people to flee their own failed states (the failure supposedly brought on by self-inflicted violence and corruption) to seek refuge in the better-run, safer and more prosperous countries.
But what we are really seeing in those pathetic half-swamped rubber boats bobbing up and down in the Channel are the thin end of the wedge of a vast exodus of people brought about by military intervention by the US and its allies. As a result of their “global war on terror”, launched following the al-Qaeda attacks in the US on 11 September 2001, no less than 37 million people have been displaced from their homes, according to a revelatory report published this week by Brown University.
The study, part of a project called “Costs of War”, is the first time that this violence-driven mass population movement has been calculated using the latest data. Its authors conclude that “at least 37 million people have fled their homes in the eight most violent wars the US military has launched or participated in since 2001”. Of these, at least 8 million are refugees who fled abroad, and 29 million are internally displaced persons (IDPs) who have taken flight inside their own countries. The eight wars examined by the report are in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Libya, Somalia, northwest Pakistan and the Philippines.
The authors of the study say that the displacement of people by these post-9/11 wars is almost without precedent. They compare the figures for the last 19 years with those for the whole of the 20th century, concluding that only the Second World War produced a bigger mass flight. Otherwise, the post-9/11 displacement exceeds that brought about by the Russian Revolution (6 million), the First World War (10 million), India-Pakistan Partition (14 million), East Bengal (10 million), the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan (6.3 million) and the Vietnam War (13 million).
Excerpted from: ‘America’s War on Terror is the True Cause of Europe’s Refugee Crisis’
Counterpunch.org
-
Luke Grimes Reveals Hilarious Reason His Baby Can't Stop Laughing At Him -
Why Kate Middleton, Prince William Opt For ‘show Stopping Style’ -
Here's Why Leonardo DiCaprio Will Not Attend This Year's 'Actors Award' Despite Major Nomination -
Ethan Hawke Reflects On Hollywood Success As Fifth Oscar Nomination Arrives -
Tom Cruise Feeling Down In The Dumps Post A Series Of Failed Romances: Report -
'The Pitt' Producer Reveals Why He Was Nervous For The New Ep Of Season Two -
Maggie Gyllenhaal Gets Honest About Being Jealous Of Jake Gyllenhaal -
'Bridgerton' Star Luke Thompson Gets Honest About Season Five -
Prince William On Verge Of Breakdown Because Of 'disgraced' Andrew -
Tig Notaro Reflects On Oscar Nod For 'Come See Me In The Good Light': 'I Was Sleeping' -
Kenyon Sadiq Sets 40-yard Dash Record At NFL Scouting Combine, Eyes First Round -
Talk Show Host Drops Hint About Taylor Swift, Travis Kelce Wedding Date -
Andrew Scandal Brings New Worries For Prince Harry, Meghan Markle -
King Charles Imposes New Restrictions On Ex-Prince Andrew In Surprise Move -
Chris Hemsworth Reveals How Elsa Pataky Guides His Career Moves -
Was Travis Barker In A Relationship With Kim Kardashian Before Marrying Her Sister?