Refugee crisis
Desperate refugees crammed into cockle-shell boats landing on the shingle beaches of the south Kent coast are easily portrayed as invaders. Anti-immigrant demonstrators were exploiting such fears last weekend as they blockaded the main highway into Dover Port in order “to protect Britain’s borders”. Meanwhile, the home secretary, Priti Patel, blames the French for not doing enough to stop the flow of refugees across the Channel.
Refugees attract much attention on the last highly visible stages of their journeys between France and Britain. But there is absurdly little interest in why they endure such hardships, risking detention or death.
There is an instinctive assumption in the west that it is perfectly natural for people to flee their own failed states (the failure supposedly brought on by self-inflicted violence and corruption) to seek refuge in the better-run, safer and more prosperous countries.
But what we are really seeing in those pathetic half-swamped rubber boats bobbing up and down in the Channel are the thin end of the wedge of a vast exodus of people brought about by military intervention by the US and its allies. As a result of their “global war on terror”, launched following the al-Qaeda attacks in the US on 11 September 2001, no less than 37 million people have been displaced from their homes, according to a revelatory report published this week by Brown University.
The study, part of a project called “Costs of War”, is the first time that this violence-driven mass population movement has been calculated using the latest data. Its authors conclude that “at least 37 million people have fled their homes in the eight most violent wars the US military has launched or participated in since 2001”. Of these, at least 8 million are refugees who fled abroad, and 29 million are internally displaced persons (IDPs) who have taken flight inside their own countries. The eight wars examined by the report are in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Libya, Somalia, northwest Pakistan and the Philippines.
The authors of the study say that the displacement of people by these post-9/11 wars is almost without precedent. They compare the figures for the last 19 years with those for the whole of the 20th century, concluding that only the Second World War produced a bigger mass flight. Otherwise, the post-9/11 displacement exceeds that brought about by the Russian Revolution (6 million), the First World War (10 million), India-Pakistan Partition (14 million), East Bengal (10 million), the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan (6.3 million) and the Vietnam War (13 million).
Excerpted from: ‘America’s War on Terror is the True Cause of Europe’s Refugee Crisis’
Counterpunch.org
-
Andrew Lownie Comes Forward About Andrew, Sarah Ferguson’s 40-year Abuse Of Power -
Lewis Capaldi Criticizes Own Music Out Of ‘care’ For Fans: ‘they Deserve Better’ -
Phil Collins Drops Out Of Rock And Roll Hall Of Fame Performance -
Trump Hails Major Progress In Peace Agreement With Iran -
Olivia Rodrigo Delights Fans With Candid BTS Moments From 'The Cure’ Shoot -
Prince Harry Gets Forced Onto A Tightrope’: ‘He Doesn’t Want To Disrespect Or Dishonor Meghan’ -
Space X’s Starship Vision Could Enable 10,000 Launches A Year, Says Elon Musk -
First AI-generated Feature Film Premieres At Cannes -
Katie Price Reacts To Lee Andrews' Father's Arrest Claims Amid Missing Case -
GTA 6 Ad Spotted Before Official Summer Marketing Push -
Prince Harry Gets Harsh Reminder About Meghan: ‘Charles Certainly Won’t Have Her In The Room!’ -
David Harbour Recalls Hilarious 'fart' Moment From 'Stranger Things' Set: 'You Just Couldn't Believe' -
Shakira Gets Honest About Her Separation From Gerard Pique -
Nasire Best: Suspect Killed In Gunfire Exchange Near White House -
Stephen Colbert Returns To TV 24 Hours After 'Late Show' Finale -
Nicolas Cage Reveals Why He Once Turned Down 'Spider-Man' Villain Role