Refugee crisis
Desperate refugees crammed into cockle-shell boats landing on the shingle beaches of the south Kent coast are easily portrayed as invaders. Anti-immigrant demonstrators were exploiting such fears last weekend as they blockaded the main highway into Dover Port in order “to protect Britain’s borders”. Meanwhile, the home secretary, Priti Patel, blames the French for not doing enough to stop the flow of refugees across the Channel.
Refugees attract much attention on the last highly visible stages of their journeys between France and Britain. But there is absurdly little interest in why they endure such hardships, risking detention or death.
There is an instinctive assumption in the west that it is perfectly natural for people to flee their own failed states (the failure supposedly brought on by self-inflicted violence and corruption) to seek refuge in the better-run, safer and more prosperous countries.
But what we are really seeing in those pathetic half-swamped rubber boats bobbing up and down in the Channel are the thin end of the wedge of a vast exodus of people brought about by military intervention by the US and its allies. As a result of their “global war on terror”, launched following the al-Qaeda attacks in the US on 11 September 2001, no less than 37 million people have been displaced from their homes, according to a revelatory report published this week by Brown University.
The study, part of a project called “Costs of War”, is the first time that this violence-driven mass population movement has been calculated using the latest data. Its authors conclude that “at least 37 million people have fled their homes in the eight most violent wars the US military has launched or participated in since 2001”. Of these, at least 8 million are refugees who fled abroad, and 29 million are internally displaced persons (IDPs) who have taken flight inside their own countries. The eight wars examined by the report are in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Libya, Somalia, northwest Pakistan and the Philippines.
The authors of the study say that the displacement of people by these post-9/11 wars is almost without precedent. They compare the figures for the last 19 years with those for the whole of the 20th century, concluding that only the Second World War produced a bigger mass flight. Otherwise, the post-9/11 displacement exceeds that brought about by the Russian Revolution (6 million), the First World War (10 million), India-Pakistan Partition (14 million), East Bengal (10 million), the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan (6.3 million) and the Vietnam War (13 million).
Excerpted from: ‘America’s War on Terror is the True Cause of Europe’s Refugee Crisis’
Counterpunch.org
-
How Queen Elizabeth Made Sure All Eyes Were On Her? -
What Did Epstein Say About Adam Back? -
Ben Stiller Gets Real About Emotional Struggles -
Michael Patrick Was Hidden In Plain Sight In 'Game Of Thrones': Here's Where Fans Spotted Him -
Duchess Makes Romance With Politician Public -
Aubrey Plaza Called Cheater By Ex-husband's Brother After Pregnancy Announcement -
Instagram Expands Teen Content Restrictions Globally After Legal Scrutiny -
Kanye West Drama Is Affecting Kim Kardashian's New Romance? -
King Charles And Queen Camilla Celebrate Wedding Anniversary -
Queen Elizabeth's Reaction To Meeting Princess Lilibet Revealed -
‘The Boys’ Star Sparks Voldemort Vibes With Bizarre Season 5 Power -
Meta Bets $21 Billion On AI Infrastructure In CoreWeave Deal -
Britt McHenry & Dianna Russini 'fight' Over Sean McVay: Old Rumors Explode Again -
Nancy Guthrie Mystery Sparks Tough Questions For FBI -
Duchess Sophie, Prince Edward Delight Andrew With Major Move -
'The Avengers' Cobie Smulders Highlights Key Point Of 'Shrinking' Costar Harrison Ford's Character