PHC issues notices to govt on petition seeking rights for tribal people
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Thursday issued notices to federal government and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa governor in a constitutional petition seeking fundamental rights for people of the tribal agencies available to other citizens in the Constitution.A two-member bench comprising Justice Waqar Ahmad Seth and Justice Younas Thahim admitted the
By Akhtar Amin
October 30, 2015
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Thursday issued notices to federal government and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa governor in a constitutional petition seeking fundamental rights for people of the tribal agencies available to other citizens in the Constitution.
A two-member bench comprising Justice Waqar Ahmad Seth and Justice Younas Thahim admitted the constitutional petition for a full hearing. The bench directed the federal government through secretary interior and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa governor to submit replies on next hearing of the case.
Muhammad Muazzam Butt filed the constitutional petition in which he raised several law points about fundamental rights of the people of Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Fata).
During the hearing, he submitted that under Article 1 (2) of both the 1956 and 1962 constitutions, Fata was not territory of Pakistan and there was no representation for the people of Fata in the Parliament.
The lawyer stated before the bench that for the first time territory of Fata was declared as part of Pakistan in 1973 Constitution. He said under the Law of Accession, the Fata territory was incorporated in Pakistan, but the inhabitants of Fata were kept deprived of the fundamental rights which are guaranteed for the citizens.
The lawyer further questioned that under Articles 9 and 25 of Constitution both the people of Fata and other citizens are equally placed in the Constitution, but the people of Fata have been deprived of the right to appeal in the constitutional courts including high court and Supreme Court.
He also submitted that under the Citizens Act 1973 and Supreme Court decision by Justice (r) Wajihuddin Ahmed both the people of Fata and other citizens were equally identified as citizens of Pakistan and despite these facts the people of Fata were deprived from their constitutional rights in the country.
In light of the Supreme Court decision, the bench admitted the petition for a full hearing and sought replies from the federal government and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa governor.
A two-member bench comprising Justice Waqar Ahmad Seth and Justice Younas Thahim admitted the constitutional petition for a full hearing. The bench directed the federal government through secretary interior and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa governor to submit replies on next hearing of the case.
Muhammad Muazzam Butt filed the constitutional petition in which he raised several law points about fundamental rights of the people of Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Fata).
During the hearing, he submitted that under Article 1 (2) of both the 1956 and 1962 constitutions, Fata was not territory of Pakistan and there was no representation for the people of Fata in the Parliament.
The lawyer stated before the bench that for the first time territory of Fata was declared as part of Pakistan in 1973 Constitution. He said under the Law of Accession, the Fata territory was incorporated in Pakistan, but the inhabitants of Fata were kept deprived of the fundamental rights which are guaranteed for the citizens.
The lawyer further questioned that under Articles 9 and 25 of Constitution both the people of Fata and other citizens are equally placed in the Constitution, but the people of Fata have been deprived of the right to appeal in the constitutional courts including high court and Supreme Court.
He also submitted that under the Citizens Act 1973 and Supreme Court decision by Justice (r) Wajihuddin Ahmed both the people of Fata and other citizens were equally identified as citizens of Pakistan and despite these facts the people of Fata were deprived from their constitutional rights in the country.
In light of the Supreme Court decision, the bench admitted the petition for a full hearing and sought replies from the federal government and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa governor.
-
Defying Age At Milano Cortina Games: Canadian Skater Stellato-Dudeke Aims For Gold At 42 -
Study Finds Screen Time Does Not Harm Teenagers’ Mental Health -
'Dunesday': What Robert Downey Jr. And Timothee Chalamet Really Think -
UK Regulator Reaffirms Ongoing Investigation Into X Deepfake Probe -
'Marty Supreme' Featured Secret Robert Pattinson Cameo? -
‘Operation Arctic Endurance’: Which NATO Nations Are Sending Troops To Greenland? -
Kate Middleton ‘disgusted’ As Andrew Points Finger At Her Over Royal Downfall -
YouTube Adds New Parental Controls For Teens, Limits Shorts Scrolling -
Sarah Ferguson Takes Big Decision As Royal Lodge Eviction Looms -
Bruno Mars Leaves Taylor Swift Behind With Shocking Move -
Trump Administration Imposes 25% Tariff On Imports Of Some AI Chips -
Chinese Smartphone Makers Adjust Prices As Costs Go Up -
Wikipedia Owner Signs AI Content Training Deals With Microsoft, Meta -
Meghan Markle’s Real Feelings Revealed Amid UK Return Rumours -
Reese Witherspoon Issues Urgent Warning After Scammers Using Her Identity -
XAI Restricts Grok Image Editing After Backlash From California And Europe