Money laundering case: CJP summons Sindh CM in his chamber
KARACHI: Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) on Friday summoned Sindh Chief Minister Murad Ali Shah as he was informed that the Sindh government departments were not cooperating with Joint Investigation Team (JIT) probing money laundering of over Rs100 billion.
The court was also told about the purported lack of cooperation from the Sindh government and other departments in the probe, at which Chief Justice Nisar asked to meet Chief Minister Murad Ali Shah in his chamber.
The top judge clarified that he was not summoning CM Murad but would meet him in his chamber regarding complaints that the Sindh government was not cooperating with the JIT.
Chief Secretary Sindh, in attendance before the court, informed that all records have been shared with the JIT. The JIT head acknowledged that all documents have indeed been received, but are yet to be scrutinised.
The chief justice remarked that he would remain in Karachi till the JIT receives all records it needs in its probe. All provincial chief secretaries have assured the court of cooperation in the case, he added.
The Federal Investigation Agency is investigating 32 people in relation to money-laundering from fictitious accounts, including former president Asif Ali Zardari and his sister Faryal Talpur. The Supreme Court (SC) ordered an inquiry into Rs73 billion, acquired in loans by the Omni Group, and warned of strict action against those who defy the court orders.
The apex court resumed hearing of the case against fake bank accounts that were used to launder over Rs100 billion out of Pakistan, at its Karachi Registry on Friday.
The head of the Joint Investigation Team (JIT) Ahsan Sadiq was present in the court, along with other officials.
He informed the court that Omni Group owed Rs73 billion in loans, of which Rs23 billion was owed to the National Bank of Pakistan and the rest to other private banks. Chief Justice directed that an inquiry be conducted into the loans owed by the Omni Group, and warned that strict action would be taken against those who fail to follow the court orders.
-
Piers Morgan Reacts To Photo With Ghislaine Maxwell -
UK Data Privacy Regulators Raises Safety Concerns, Warn Against AI-generated Images -
Kate Middleton, Prince William 'steeling Themselves' For Harry's Inevitable Arrival With Lilibet, Archie -
Australian PM Agrees With King Charles, Backs Removing Andrew From Line Of Succession -
Kiefer Sutherland's Arrest Sparks Fresh Fears As Friends 'beg Him' To Get Help After Father's Death -
John Davidson 2026 BAFTA Backlash: Tourettes Action Charity Defends Him Over 'unintentional' Racial Slur -
Kim Kardashian Obsessed TV Star 'Lip King' Breathes His Last At 32 -
Prince Harry Backtracks On Privacy Fears For Princess Lilibet: Here’s Why Public Saw Her Face Amid Andrew Drama -
Prince Harry Appears To Have Bowed To Meghan Markle's Decisions -
Andrew Scandal Shockwave Prompts Key Commonwealth Member To Back UK Efforts -
Sterling K. Brown's Wife Reveals If She Gets 'Paradise' Spoilers -
Rape Suspect Flees Aboard After Mistaken Prison Release -
Jack Hughes' Patriotic Words Spark Calls For Tate McRae To Dump Her Boyfriend -
Andrew Pushes For Major Deal With King Charles To Avoid Jail -
50 Cent Online Trolling Tactic Exposed As He Targets Rival Rappers' Mothers In Rap Beefs -
King Charles Attends 'series Of Meetings' Amid Growing Calls For His Abdication