PHC seeks comments from judge in case transfer plea
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Monday sought comments from an Accountability Court judge in an application filed by a police officer who was arrested over graft charges and is seeking transfer of his case from the court. Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) Rajab Ali was arrested by
By our correspondents
April 07, 2015
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Monday sought comments from an Accountability Court judge in an application filed by a police officer who was arrested over graft charges and is seeking transfer of his case from the court.
Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) Rajab Ali was arrested by the National Accountability Bureau for allegedly making illegal assets worth millions of rupees. He was DSP (City) in Mardan district at the time of his arrest.
Later, he filed an application in the high court and sought transfer of his case from the accountability court presided over by Zarqaish Sani. Mohammad Ibrahim and Ataullah, lawyers for Rajab Ali, submitted before the bench that their client had serious reservations about his trial in the Accountability Court No-2 as the NAB had allegedly provided accommodation and other facilities to the judge.
They submitted that the judge was residing in the house provided by NAB. The client, they believed, did not expect justice from the court. Second, the petitioner’s lawyers submitted that the judge was also not providing them an opportunity for cross-examination of the NAB’s witnesses in the case. The NAB’s prosecutor, Umar Farooq Khan, informed the bench that the trial of the accused had started and statement of three witnesses had been recorded.
Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) Rajab Ali was arrested by the National Accountability Bureau for allegedly making illegal assets worth millions of rupees. He was DSP (City) in Mardan district at the time of his arrest.
Later, he filed an application in the high court and sought transfer of his case from the accountability court presided over by Zarqaish Sani. Mohammad Ibrahim and Ataullah, lawyers for Rajab Ali, submitted before the bench that their client had serious reservations about his trial in the Accountability Court No-2 as the NAB had allegedly provided accommodation and other facilities to the judge.
They submitted that the judge was residing in the house provided by NAB. The client, they believed, did not expect justice from the court. Second, the petitioner’s lawyers submitted that the judge was also not providing them an opportunity for cross-examination of the NAB’s witnesses in the case. The NAB’s prosecutor, Umar Farooq Khan, informed the bench that the trial of the accused had started and statement of three witnesses had been recorded.
-
Billie Eilish Slammed For Making Political Speech At Grammys -
Beverley Callard Announces Her Cancer Diagnosis: 'Quite Nervous' -
WhatsApp May Add Instagram Style Close Friends For Status Updates -
Winter Olympics Officially Open In Milan, Cortina With Historic Dual Cauldron Lighting -
Sciences Reveals Shocking Body Response Against Heart Attack -
Who Is Charlie Puth? Inside Awards, Hits & Journey Of Super Bowl Anthem Singer -
Jared Leto 'swings For The Fences' In 'Master Of The Universe'? -
Kelsea Ballerini, Chase Stokes Not On Same Page About Third Split: Deets -
Shanghai Fusion ‘Artificial Sun’ Achieves Groundbreaking Results With Plasma Control Record -
Princess Anne Enjoys Andrea Bocelli, Lang Lang Performances At Winter Olympics Opening Ceremony -
Ben Stiller Cherishes Working With Late David Bowie -
Anti-inflammatory Teas To Keep Your Gut Balanced -
Polar Vortex ‘exceptional’ Disruption: Rare Shift Signals Extreme February Winter -
Which Countries Are Worst And Best In Public Sector AI Race? -
Matthew McConaughey Opens Up About His Painful Battle With THIS -
Emma Stone Reveals She Is ‘too Afraid’ Of Her ‘own Mental Health’