PHC seeks comments from judge in case transfer plea
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Monday sought comments from an Accountability Court judge in an application filed by a police officer who was arrested over graft charges and is seeking transfer of his case from the court. Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) Rajab Ali was arrested by
By our correspondents
April 07, 2015
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Monday sought comments from an Accountability Court judge in an application filed by a police officer who was arrested over graft charges and is seeking transfer of his case from the court.
Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) Rajab Ali was arrested by the National Accountability Bureau for allegedly making illegal assets worth millions of rupees. He was DSP (City) in Mardan district at the time of his arrest.
Later, he filed an application in the high court and sought transfer of his case from the accountability court presided over by Zarqaish Sani. Mohammad Ibrahim and Ataullah, lawyers for Rajab Ali, submitted before the bench that their client had serious reservations about his trial in the Accountability Court No-2 as the NAB had allegedly provided accommodation and other facilities to the judge.
They submitted that the judge was residing in the house provided by NAB. The client, they believed, did not expect justice from the court. Second, the petitioner’s lawyers submitted that the judge was also not providing them an opportunity for cross-examination of the NAB’s witnesses in the case. The NAB’s prosecutor, Umar Farooq Khan, informed the bench that the trial of the accused had started and statement of three witnesses had been recorded.
Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) Rajab Ali was arrested by the National Accountability Bureau for allegedly making illegal assets worth millions of rupees. He was DSP (City) in Mardan district at the time of his arrest.
Later, he filed an application in the high court and sought transfer of his case from the accountability court presided over by Zarqaish Sani. Mohammad Ibrahim and Ataullah, lawyers for Rajab Ali, submitted before the bench that their client had serious reservations about his trial in the Accountability Court No-2 as the NAB had allegedly provided accommodation and other facilities to the judge.
They submitted that the judge was residing in the house provided by NAB. The client, they believed, did not expect justice from the court. Second, the petitioner’s lawyers submitted that the judge was also not providing them an opportunity for cross-examination of the NAB’s witnesses in the case. The NAB’s prosecutor, Umar Farooq Khan, informed the bench that the trial of the accused had started and statement of three witnesses had been recorded.
-
NASA Celebrates One Year Of Trump’s Second Term With Moon And Mars Achievements -
Chris Pratt Shares Real Thoughts On AI In Film Industry -
Netflix Disappointed As Meghan Markle’s Series Struggles To Impress -
Royal Family Announces Death Of Princess: King Releases Statement -
Sarah Ferguson Will Continue To Be Part Of Andrew's Life -
Google’s Gemini Now Offers Free SAT Prep With Full-length Mock Tests -
Everything You Need To Know About Macron’s Viral Glasses: Cost, Model, All Details Revealed -
Elon Musk Warns Of AI ‘supersonic Tsunami’: What It Means For Future -
Why Victoria Beckham's Dance Video From Brooklyn's Wedding Won't Be Released -
Prince Harry No Longer Focused On Healing Royal Family Feud? -
OpenAI Aims To Make AI A Daily Global Tool -
Will Andrew Receive Any Royal Treatment After Title, Royal Lodge Removal? -
How Your Body 'suffers' In Back Pain And Simple Way To Fix It -
What Victoria Beckham Really Did At Brooklyn, Nicola’s Wedding Revealed -
Send Your Name To Moon With Nasa’s Artemis Mission: Here’s How -
Zhipu AI, MiniMax Debuts Mask Structural Hurdles For China’s Tech Giants