PHC orders pensions for Class-IV employees appointed in 80s
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) has declared that all the retired Class-IV employees, including those who have died during service or later, were also entitled for pension even if their service as regular employees was less than 10 years.
A larger bench comprising Justice Roohul Amin Khan, Justice Qalandar Ali Khan and Justice Syed Muhammad Attique Shah directed various government departments to issue pension to the Class-IV employees who had been appointed in 1988-89 on contract or fixed pay and their service was regularised in 2008.
The larger bench allowed the writ petitions and directed various departments of the provincial government to issue pension to all the retired employees even to the relatives of those who have died.
The PHC chief justice had constituted the larger bench on this legal point as there were conflicting judgments of the high court on the issue.
One bench had allowed such petitions and directed the government to pay the petitioners pension and another bench had dismissed such petitions with observations that they were not entitled for the pension.
The larger bench ruled that the services of these employees come under the West Pakistan Civil Servant Pension Rules and thus they are entitled to the pension even if their service as regular employee was less than 10 years.
The bench issued the decision in writ petitions by Abdul Hakeem, Rizwan and 60 others filed through their lawyers including Khushdil Khan, Khalid Rehman, Asif Yousafzai and Shah Faisal Ilyas.
The lawyers submitted that the provincial government had appointed the petitioners and other Class-IV employees in various departments in 1988-89 on fixed pay. They said that later the provincial government regularised these employees in 2008.
They argued that later some employees retired and others died during service. They said that when the retired employees and legal heirs of the deceased employees applied for the pension, the officials concerned refused to pay pension to them and said they were not entitled to the pension as their services as regular employees were less than 10 years.
However, the law officer representing the provincial government defended the stance of the government and said that they were not entitled to the pension because their service as regular employee was less than 10 years.
The bench, after detailed arguments from both parties, allowed the writ petitions and directed various departments of the provincial government to pay and start pensions to the petitioners and for legal heirs of those employees who have died.
-
Piers Morgan Reacts To Photo With Ghislaine Maxwell -
UK Data Privacy Regulators Raises Safety Concerns, Warn Against AI-generated Images -
Kate Middleton, Prince William 'steeling Themselves' For Harry's Inevitable Arrival With Lilibet, Archie -
Australian PM Agrees With King Charles, Backs Removing Andrew From Line Of Succession -
Kiefer Sutherland's Arrest Sparks Fresh Fears As Friends 'beg Him' To Get Help After Father's Death -
John Davidson 2026 BAFTA Backlash: Tourettes Action Charity Defends Him Over 'unintentional' Racial Slur -
Kim Kardashian Obsessed TV Star 'Lip King' Breathes His Last At 32 -
Prince Harry Backtracks On Privacy Fears For Princess Lilibet: Here’s Why Public Saw Her Face Amid Andrew Drama -
Prince Harry Appears To Have Bowed To Meghan Markle's Decisions -
Andrew Scandal Shockwave Prompts Key Commonwealth Member To Back UK Efforts -
Sterling K. Brown's Wife Reveals If She Gets 'Paradise' Spoilers -
Rape Suspect Flees Aboard After Mistaken Prison Release -
Jack Hughes' Patriotic Words Spark Calls For Tate McRae To Dump Her Boyfriend -
Andrew Pushes For Major Deal With King Charles To Avoid Jail -
50 Cent Online Trolling Tactic Exposed As He Targets Rival Rappers' Mothers In Rap Beefs -
King Charles Attends 'series Of Meetings' Amid Growing Calls For His Abdication