PHC orders pensions for Class-IV employees appointed in 80s
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) has declared that all the retired Class-IV employees, including those who have died during service or later, were also entitled for pension even if their service as regular employees was less than 10 years.
A larger bench comprising Justice Roohul Amin Khan, Justice Qalandar Ali Khan and Justice Syed Muhammad Attique Shah directed various government departments to issue pension to the Class-IV employees who had been appointed in 1988-89 on contract or fixed pay and their service was regularised in 2008.
The larger bench allowed the writ petitions and directed various departments of the provincial government to issue pension to all the retired employees even to the relatives of those who have died.
The PHC chief justice had constituted the larger bench on this legal point as there were conflicting judgments of the high court on the issue.
One bench had allowed such petitions and directed the government to pay the petitioners pension and another bench had dismissed such petitions with observations that they were not entitled for the pension.
The larger bench ruled that the services of these employees come under the West Pakistan Civil Servant Pension Rules and thus they are entitled to the pension even if their service as regular employee was less than 10 years.
The bench issued the decision in writ petitions by Abdul Hakeem, Rizwan and 60 others filed through their lawyers including Khushdil Khan, Khalid Rehman, Asif Yousafzai and Shah Faisal Ilyas.
The lawyers submitted that the provincial government had appointed the petitioners and other Class-IV employees in various departments in 1988-89 on fixed pay. They said that later the provincial government regularised these employees in 2008.
They argued that later some employees retired and others died during service. They said that when the retired employees and legal heirs of the deceased employees applied for the pension, the officials concerned refused to pay pension to them and said they were not entitled to the pension as their services as regular employees were less than 10 years.
However, the law officer representing the provincial government defended the stance of the government and said that they were not entitled to the pension because their service as regular employee was less than 10 years.
The bench, after detailed arguments from both parties, allowed the writ petitions and directed various departments of the provincial government to pay and start pensions to the petitioners and for legal heirs of those employees who have died.
-
Spotify Introduces New Monthly Subscription Pricing Plan For 2026 -
Shocking Prediction About Meghan Markle's Career In 2026 -
Kate Middleton Hosts Reception In London As Prince William Out On Engagement -
Mel C Teases 'precious' Future Plans -
Teyana Taylor On Julia Roberts Telling Her To 'eat A Sandwich' At Golden Globes: 'Started Crying' -
Minneapolis: ICE Officer Fires Bullet After Migrant Attacks With A Shovel -
Prince William Gets 'mobbed' By Animals During Rural Engagement -
Angelina Jolie Finally Escaping L.A.? -
Matthew McConaughey Takes Legal Action To Save THIS Iconic Phrase From AI Misuse -
Jodie Foster Reflects On Harsh Reality Of Why She Escaped Sexual Abuse As Actress -
Prince Harry, Meghan Markle To Have Baby In 2026? -
Bella Hadid Steals The Spotlight At 'The Beauty' Premiere -
Taylor Swift 'worst Photos': Singer's Not-so-perfect Moments Spark Debate -
Arizona Mother Traces Missing Son Living In Neighbour’s Home After Killing Hm -
OpenAI Launches ChatGPT Translate To Rival Google Translate -
Top AI Themes Poised To Shape 2026: Here’s How