BHC bans strikes, protests by govt officials
QUETTA: The Balochistan High Court (BHC) on Monday ordered a ban on strikes and protests by all government employees, including doctors and teachers.The order was passed by a two-member bench of the high court comprising Chief Justice Muhammad Noor Maskanzai and Justice Muhammad Hashim Kakar while hearing a constitutional petition
By our correspondents
November 10, 2015
QUETTA: The Balochistan High Court (BHC) on Monday ordered a ban on strikes and protests by all government employees, including doctors and teachers.
The order was passed by a two-member bench of the high court comprising Chief Justice Muhammad Noor Maskanzai and Justice Muhammad Hashim Kakar while hearing a constitutional petition filed by the All Government Teachers’ Association.
The court ordered that no government employee, especially teachers and doctors, could observe a strike or protest, and legal action would be taken by the department concerned against those who violated this order. The head of the institution will also face legal action if any violation of the order is committed, the court said.
The court said that the strikes of teachers and doctors directly affect the masses and people have to face difficulties during strikes because of the blocking of roads. It said that no strike or protest should be observed in private schools and hospitals.
The petitioner had approached the court over the defying of court orders on the implementation of allowances and other demands of teachers.
The notices were issued to teachers and other government employees’ organisations, including the All Pakistan Clerks Association, All Government Teachers Association, Secretariat Staff Association, Pakistan Medical Association, Pakistan Paramedical Association and other teachers’ organisations.
Additional Advocate General Shehak Baloch, senior lawyer Hadi Shakeel and Mazhar Ilyas Nagi played the role of amicus curiae and the court lauded their role when the court asked those parties to present a justification for their protests and strikes.
The court said that if any employee faced any problem then he should adopt a legal way and approach the courts.
The order was passed by a two-member bench of the high court comprising Chief Justice Muhammad Noor Maskanzai and Justice Muhammad Hashim Kakar while hearing a constitutional petition filed by the All Government Teachers’ Association.
The court ordered that no government employee, especially teachers and doctors, could observe a strike or protest, and legal action would be taken by the department concerned against those who violated this order. The head of the institution will also face legal action if any violation of the order is committed, the court said.
The court said that the strikes of teachers and doctors directly affect the masses and people have to face difficulties during strikes because of the blocking of roads. It said that no strike or protest should be observed in private schools and hospitals.
The petitioner had approached the court over the defying of court orders on the implementation of allowances and other demands of teachers.
The notices were issued to teachers and other government employees’ organisations, including the All Pakistan Clerks Association, All Government Teachers Association, Secretariat Staff Association, Pakistan Medical Association, Pakistan Paramedical Association and other teachers’ organisations.
Additional Advocate General Shehak Baloch, senior lawyer Hadi Shakeel and Mazhar Ilyas Nagi played the role of amicus curiae and the court lauded their role when the court asked those parties to present a justification for their protests and strikes.
The court said that if any employee faced any problem then he should adopt a legal way and approach the courts.
-
Piers Morgan Reacts To Photo With Ghislaine Maxwell -
UK Data Privacy Regulators Raises Safety Concerns, Warn Against AI-generated Images -
Kate Middleton, Prince William 'steeling Themselves' For Harry's Inevitable Arrival With Lilibet, Archie -
Australian PM Agrees With King Charles, Backs Removing Andrew From Line Of Succession -
Kiefer Sutherland's Arrest Sparks Fresh Fears As Friends 'beg Him' To Get Help After Father's Death -
John Davidson 2026 BAFTA Backlash: Tourettes Action Charity Defends Him Over 'unintentional' Racial Slur -
Kim Kardashian Obsessed TV Star 'Lip King' Breathes His Last At 32 -
Prince Harry Backtracks On Privacy Fears For Princess Lilibet: Here’s Why Public Saw Her Face Amid Andrew Drama -
Prince Harry Appears To Have Bowed To Meghan Markle's Decisions -
Andrew Scandal Shockwave Prompts Key Commonwealth Member To Back UK Efforts -
Sterling K. Brown's Wife Reveals If She Gets 'Paradise' Spoilers -
Rape Suspect Flees Aboard After Mistaken Prison Release -
Jack Hughes' Patriotic Words Spark Calls For Tate McRae To Dump Her Boyfriend -
Andrew Pushes For Major Deal With King Charles To Avoid Jail -
50 Cent Online Trolling Tactic Exposed As He Targets Rival Rappers' Mothers In Rap Beefs -
King Charles Attends 'series Of Meetings' Amid Growing Calls For His Abdication