May 9 arson cases: IHC judge to hear PTI founder’s plea against possible military trial
Court was requested that PTI founder be placed under jurisdiction of civilian courts
ISLAMABAD: Islamabad High Court (IHC) Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb will hear the petition of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder with regard to the shifting of the May 9 arson cases to a military court and the possibility of transfer of his custody to military authorities. In the petition, without mentioning the name of the arrested former Lt Gen (retd) Faiz Hameed, it has been submitted that the retired army officer was taken into custody by the military, and he (the PTI founder) could be tried in a military court if he became an approver in the case.
The court was requested that the PTI founder be placed under the jurisdiction of civilian courts, and the authorities be restrained from handing him over into military custody. There are several objections to the petition by the Registrar Office.
In a petition filed by the PTI founder in the IHC, it has been stated that there are rumours of a military trial for the May 9 and May 10 cases. He said observers say that he would be handed over into military custody and tried by a military court. He also said he himself had earlier expressed his apprehension about what was reported in the media.
The petitioner said that a few weeks ago, a senior retired army officer had been taken into military custody, and according to media reports, the retired army officer could become a witness against the petitioner, who could be transferred into military custody if the retired army officer becomes an approver against him.
The federation has been made a respondent in the petition through the Ministry of Law, while the Ministry of Interior, the Ministry of Defence, the Islamabad IG, the Punjab IG, the Punjab Prisons IG, the superintendent of Adiala Jail and the FIA have also been cited as respondents.
The Registrar Office has raised objections to the petition as to how general relief can be sought without any reference to a specific FIR, and without attaching any order or document to the petition. The office has asked how an application on Punjab cases can be filed with the IHC, and the last objection is that when the matter of military courts is pending with the Supreme Court, how an application can be filed with the high court.
-
Karoline Leavitt Joins Erika Kirk At Washington Event -
Princess Beatrice’s Husband Edo ‘questioning Marriage’: ‘His Standing & Status Is Impacted’ -
Petition To Strip Blake Lively Of 'It Ends With Us' PGA Credit Gains Massive Support -
New Development In Blake Lively Lawsuit After Judge Dismisses Major Claims -
Prince Harry’s Behavior Towards Queen Elizabeth Gets Exposed: ‘He Drove Her To Paranoia’ -
Blake Lively, Taylor Swift Texts Resurface After Court Ruling -
Blake Lively, Justin Baldoni's Legal Case Receives Latest Update -
Kylie Jenner Says Goodbye To Her Halloween Era: 'I've Retired It' -
Mel B Reveals Why Spice Girls Documentary May Never Happen -
Maggie Gyllenhaal Recalls Emotional Impact Of Seeing Husband With Other Woman -
Scarlett Johansson Shares Wild First Concert Story -
Inside King Charles, Queen Camilla's First US State Visit -
Tiger Woods' Situation Deemed 'too Far Down The Line' After DUI Crash -
List Of Blake Lively’s Dismissed And Allowed Claims Against Justin Baldoni -
Dolly Parton's Rare Approach To Battle Grief Following Tragic Loss Of Late Husband Laid Bare -
How Queen Elizabeth's Silence Impacted Diana And Meghan