ISLAMABAD/SARGODHA: A special anti-terrorism court (ATC) in Sargodha on Monday dismissed PTI Secretary-General Omar Ayub’s bail petition over non-appearance as police personnel stopped him from presenting himself before the judge, his lawyer said, prompting a strong protest from the party, Geo News reported.
Ayub had arrived earlier on Monday at the court premises to appear before the court; however, he could not ensure his attendance due to the law enforcers, his lawyer told reporters, which led to his bail plea’s dismissal in the May 9 and 10 riots case.
Several politicos, including Ayub, Amjad Khan Niazi and Malik Ehsan Ullah Tiwana, have been nominated in the case.
With several leaders set to appear, authorities had deployed additional police personnel near the compound.
As he was being stopped, Ayub told reporters that the police personnel were not allowing him to appear before the court on Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s “instructions”.
“They have taken the special court’s judge hostage,” alleged Ayub, who is the opposition leader in the National Assembly. “Under the guise of security, the police have stopped me from presenting myself before the judge. But I will not leave before marking my attendance,” he had said but failed to do so.
For his part, the PTI leader and lawyer Babar Awan, who was also present there, said the government should “punish others to the extent that they can bear themselves”, while also alleging that a few people were playing with the country’s security.
He said that his clients were not being allowed to appear before the court. “Chief Justice of Pakistan [Qazi Faez Isa] should take notice. Which door will we knock on for justice?”
Gohar Ijaz says burden of negligence of government departments in the IPPs case was being put on the public
The discussions focused on significant strides made by Pakistan in improving its macroeconomic indicators by focused...
A single bench, comprising Justice Tariq Saleem Sheikh, heard petition filed by wife of PTI founder
Co-curricular activities regarding August 14 celebrations shall continue in letter and spirit
At beginning of hearing at 10 o'clock, lawyers were not present in court
“There’s a difference between censorship and regulating ,” says Talal Chaudhry