WHO opposes US travel ban on Ebola-affected countries
As of mid-May 2026, Ebola outbreak has resulted in over 500 suspected cases and more than 130 deaths
The World Health Organization (WHO) officials have recently shared their views on the US travel ban on Ebola affected countries including Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Uganda, or South Sudan.
Earlier this week on May 16, the global health agency declared the current Ebola outbreak, specifically the Bundibugyo virus, a public health emergency of international concern.
In response to the outbreak, the Trump administration invoked Title 42 to restrict the entry for non-US passport holders who have been in the DRC, South Sudan and Uganda in the previous 21 days. The ban is going to be in effect for at least 30 days.
But according to the WHO officials, this ban is not recommended as Ebola is not an airborne virus.
The virus spread only through direct contact with blood or body fluids, so travel restrictions are "not supported under the IHR recommendations."
In a press conference, Dr Abdirahman Mahamud who is Director at the Alert and Response Coordination Department of the WHO's Emergency Health Programme said, “In recent situations what works is contract tracing, monitoring those who contact, isolation and immediate referrals.”
“Our top priority is to work closely with DRC in ensuring all the contacts are traced and all the patients suspected are put in the clinical pathway in a safe environment and with the best care provided.”
“Ebola is not a casual contact. It is not airborne. I think we need to be aware of that and this relates to travel restrictions that are not supported under the IHR recommendations,” Mahamud added.
While the WHO has advised countries to maintain border screening, it has explicitly recommended against broad travel and trade restrictions, noting that such measures are often ineffective and can disrupt humanitarian aid, damage local economies, and discourage international cooperation.
H.E. Dr Jean Kaseya, Africa CDC Director General has strongly criticized the ban, stating, “The fastest path to protecting all countries in the world is to aggressively support outbreak control at the source.”
“Global health security cannot be achieved through borders alone. It is achieved through partnership, trust, science and rapid investment in preparedness and response capacity.”
As of mid-May 2026, the outbreak has resulted in over 500 suspected cases and more than 130 deaths.
The situation is further complicated because the Bundibugyo strain currently lacks widely available vaccines or specific cures.
-
How Trump’s ‘forever chemicals’ rollback could impact drinking water across America
-
Study reveals watermelon may boost heart health and diet quality
-
WHO declares Ebola outbreak emergency in DR Congo
-
Plastic surgeons see rise in AI-generated beauty requests
-
Vitamin B2 may help cancer cells survive, scientists reveals dark side
-
Ebola returns to DR Congo, Africa CDC confirms
-
Hantavirus outbreak: Could it be new pandemic threat like COVID? Experts weigh in
-
Meningitis leaves one dead, others critically ill; Know how it spreads
-
PCOS renamed PMOS: What new diagnosis means for millions of women’s health
-
Endometriosis linked to small increase in birth defect risk in Canadian study
-
Health Canada issues safety warning over baby self-feeding products sold on Amazon
-
Do psychopaths and others have same brain structure? Scientists reveal shocking details
