Epstein files again brings Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor to the forefront

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has found himself back in the frying pan, from the fire, now that three million more pages have been released about the known financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Daily Express journalist Giles Sheldrick is the one that made these claims because in his point of view “there can be no better example of sickening arrogance and greed than Andrew Mountbatten Windsor.”

The writer even called him a “shameless” man who for years has “heaped embarrassment, shame and ignominy” upon his own children, his family, and even the country.

The reason, the newly released Epstein files from the Department of Justice that contain more than three million pages. They show not just more insight into Andrew and Epstein’s connection but also brings in names from Hollywood’s A-lister sphere.

In particular with Andrew the details that have emerged claim loans were offered, tours of Buckingham Palace were also thrown around, but not just that, even the known financier off ‘offered’ Andrew women.

Yet, as the writer Sheldrick puts it “unashamed, the former not-so-grand old Duke of York continues to see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil.”

They also brought up the death of his accuser Virginia Giuffre, who passed last year in April by suicide at the age of 41, as well as the request by the House Oversight Committee for his testimony and aid in the house—all of which were rejected by the former Duke who has “no legal obligation” to fly to the other side of the pond.

But that did not stop the writer from posing the question him and say “it would not be too much of an inconvenience for him to fly to America and reveal everything he knows about Epstein, whatever that might be, including his network of mates and their influence on them.” Perhaps even answer some burning questions like “wwhat did he want, and why did Andrew bend over backwards to assist?” before signing off.