close
Sunday May 05, 2024

China passes law granting Communist Party more control over cabinet

Newly added articles stress that the State Council must resolutely uphold the Party Central Committee’s authority

By REUTERS
March 12, 2024
Xi Jinping delivering a report to the 20th CPC National Congress on behalf of the 19th CPC Central Committee. — Xinhua/File
Xi Jinping delivering a report to the 20th CPC National Congress on behalf of the 19th CPC Central Committee. — Xinhua/File

BEIJING: China’s parliament on Monday revised a law to effectively grant the Communist Party more executive control over China’s cabinet, the State Council, after cancelling the premier’s post-parliament news conference for the first time in three decades. The amended State Council Organic Law passed by 2,883 delegate votes, with eight opposing and nine abstaining, during the closing day of the National People’s Congress in Beijing.

It was the latest in a series of measures in recent years that have gradually eroded the executive authority of the State Council, helmed by Chinese Premier Li Qiang, which nominally oversees China’s 21 government ministries as well as local governments.

Legal experts say the amendment of the State Council Organic Law for the first time since 1982 continues a trend of transferring more power from the state into the Party’s hands, leaving the government to faithfully implement Party directives.

Newly added articles stress that the State Council must “resolutely uphold the Party Central Committee’s authority and its centralised and unified leadership” and follow Xi Jinping Thought, the party’s name for the president’s signature ideology, which expounds on subjects ranging from diplomacy to culture.

“This is a significant shift in the reorganization of executive authority in China,” said Ryan Mitchell, a law professor at the Chinese University of Hong Kong. “While it is always clear that the head of the Party is the most influential figure in the overall hierarchy, the exact division of labour in policymaking and, especially, oversight of policy execution, can be opaque.”