SC to hear review pleas against Faizabad sit-in verdict on 28th
3-member bench of SC headed by CJP comprising Justice Amin-ud-Din Khan, Justice Minallah will hear review petitions
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court will take up on September 28, review petitions filed against its decision given on the Faizabad sit-in case.
A three-member bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa and comprising Justice Amin-ud-Din Khan and Justice Athar Minallah will hear the review petitions. It is pertinent to mention here that on April 15, 2019 the then federal government through the Ministry of Defense, Intelligence Bureau, the then government of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf (PTI), Sheikh Rashid Ahmed, MQM, Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority and others had filed review petitions against the apex court judgment pronounced by the incumbent Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa on the Faizabad sit-in case.
Earlier on February 6, 2019, a two-member bench of the apex court comprising Justice Qazi Faez Isa and Justice Mushir Alam recommended that persons, issuing an edict or Fatwa to harm another person or put another person in the harm’s way must be dealt with iron hand and prosecuted under relevant laws. It also ruled that the intelligence agencies must not exceed their respective mandates. Later the bench disposed of a suo moto case the 2017 Faizabad sit-in staged by the Tehreek-i-Labbaik Pakistan (TLP).
Meanwhile, Chief Justice of Pakistan Justice Qazi Faez Isa observed that the people living in Pakistan will have to pay taxes saying the money generated through taxes could be utilised for building roads, schools and bridges that will facilitate the people at large. The observation came as a three-member bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa comprising Justice Amin-ud-Din Khan and Justice Athar Minallah heard a case against the collection of taxes in the former tribal areas of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP).
Justice Athar Minallah observed that after the abolition of the special status of the tribal areas, there was no need to issue a notification for the application of the income tax law.
The Supreme Court also imposed a fine worth Rs5,000 against a lawyer for wasting the court’s time and ordered him to submit a receipt after depositing the amount in any welfare organization of his choice. A three-member bench headed by the Chief Justice of Pakistan Qazi Faez Isa heard the case pertaining to a property. During the proceedings, the CJP remarked that the petitioner’s counsel tried to mislead the court.
-
Prince Harry Talks About ‘hard Days’ As He Discusses Social Media -
Camila Morrone: Dua Lipa 'lookalike' Hits New Heights After Netflix Series -
Blake Lively Lawsuit Against Justin Baldoni Takes Dramatic Turn After Judge's Ruling -
Royal Maundy Service 2026: King Charles And Queen Camilla In Pictures -
Chris Pratt Shares Sad Update About 'Jurassic World' -
Gucci Mane Robbery, Kidnapping: DoJ Makes Statement On Pooh Shiesty And Big30 Involvement -
Why King Charles Gave Meghan Markle ‘ultimate Refusal’ -
Pam Bondi, Dubbed Trump's Ghislaine Maxwell, Gets Fired -
King Charles Breaks Silence On Trump Claim About UK Government -
Meryl Streep 'chuffed' After Surprising Family Link To Anna Wintour Revealed -
Meghan Markle’s Plans To Move With Prince Harry: Insider -
Jamie Lee Curtis Embraces New Role In Life: 'Greatest Lessons, Hardest Days' -
Prince Harry And Meghan's Wedding Video Used For Engagement Farming -
Prince William’s Biographer Breaks Down If Harry Can Find His Way Back To The Firm Before Coronation -
Noah Schnapp Covers Up Relationship Mystery With ‘April Fools’ Prank -
Macron Slams Trump: ‘Neither Elegant Nor Up To Standard’ Over Mockery