Trump's legal fight intensifies as Supreme Court set to rule on his immunity claims
Trump appealed to Supreme Court, seeking a shield from criminal liability, and asked top court to put its decision on hold
The Supreme Court, with its 6-3 conservative majority, has decided to tackle the pivotal question of whether former President Donald Trump is immune from prosecution regarding attempts to overturn the 2020 election results.
The decision marks a significant moment as it is the first time the highest court is delving into such a case.
The legal dispute arose when a US Court of Appeals panel rejected Trump's argument of presidential immunity, stating that a president does not possess unbounded authority to commit acts that would compromise the democratic process. The court ruled unanimously: "We cannot accept former President Trump's claim that a president has unbounded authority to commit crimes that would neutralise the most fundamental check on executive power - the recognition and implementation of election results."
In response, Trump appealed the case to the Supreme Court, seeking a shield from criminal liability, and asked the top court to put its decision on hold.
The 77-year-old former president faces charges of witness tampering and conspiracy to defraud the US, related to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election. The trial, initially scheduled for March, now faces a delay as the Supreme Court has slated arguments for the week of April 22.
As Trump navigates a series of federal and state criminal charges, including a trial in late March over falsifying business records, the legal battleground intensifies. Throughout, Trump has consistently proclaimed his innocence, denouncing the charges as political "witch hunts."
The Supreme Court's decision not only impacts Trump's immediate legal battles but also holds broader implications, with a separate case exploring whether he can be disqualified from seeking a second term under the 14th Amendment's "insurrection ban."
Meantime, the apex court is also hearing arguments in a separate case on plea seeking Trump's disqualification from running for a second term under the 14th Amendment's "insurrection ban."
-
AOC calls for political unity while campaigning for Abdul El-Sayed in Michigan
-
Ukraine resumes Russian oil strikes amid Starlink restrictions and US intelligence concerns
-
Trump's ambassador tells Canadian politicians to keep their ‘nose out’ of US elections
-
Carney says Canadian security agencies monitoring foreign interference ahead of Alberta vote
-
Nicolás Maduro and wife plead not guilty to new torture allegations in US court
-
England issues severe drought declaration following driest months in a century
-
Texas faces voting rights lawsuit after 600,000 registrations caught in IT failure
-
Illinois teen accused of plotting mass shooting at Hindu temple after co-workers alert police
-
Trump approval rating hits new low as Democrats lead Republicans by nine points
-
Trump overrules Pete Hegseth's plan to livestream Fort Hood gunman's execution
-
William Chapman, the man killed by tiger at Yorkshire zoo had schizophrenia, inquest told
-
Trump says execution of Nidal Hasan will not be livestreamed