US Supreme Court limits government powers to curb greenhouse gases
WASHINGTON: The US Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that the government’s key environmental agency cannot issue broad limits on greenhouse gases, sharply curtailing the power of President Joe Biden’s administration to battle climate change.
By a majority of 6-3, the high court found that Environmental Protection Agency did not have the power to set broad caps on emissions from coal-fired power plants, which produce nearly 20 percent of the electricity consumed in the United States.
The decision sets back Biden’s hopes of using the EPA to bring down emissions to meet global climate goals. It was a significant victory for the coal mining and coal power industry, which had been targeted for tough limits in 2015 by the administration of then president Barack Obama in an effort to slash carbon pollution.
It was also a victory for conservatives fighting government regulation of industry, with the court’s majority including three right-wing justices named by former president Donald Trump, who had sought to weaken the EPA.
While EPA had the power to regulate individual plants, the court ruled, Congress had not given it such expansive powers to set limits for all electricity generating units. The majority justices said they recognized that putting caps on carbon dioxide emissions to transition away from coal-generated electricity "may be a sensible solution" to global warming.
But they said the case involved a "major question" of US governance and jurisprudence and that the EPA would have to be specifically delegated such powers by the legislature. "It is not plausible that Congress gave EPA the authority to adopt on its own such a regulatory scheme," they said.
"A decision of such magnitude and consequence rests with Congress itself, or an agency acting pursuant to a clear delegation from that representative body," they said. The three-member liberal minority of the cases castigated the majority for overruling powers they said EPA did in fact have. "Today, the court strips the Environmental Protection Agency of the power Congress gave it to respond to ‘the most pressing environmental challenge of our time,’" they said.
-
Andrew, Sarah Ferguson Refuse King Charles Request: 'Raising Eyebrows Inside Palace' -
Adam Sandler Reveals How Tom Cruise Introduced Him To Paul Thomas Anderson -
Washington Post CEO William Lewis Resigns After Sweeping Layoffs -
North Korea To Hold 9th Workers’ Party Congress In Late February -
All You Need To Know Guide To Rosacea -
Princess Diana's Brother 'handed Over' Althorp House To Marion And Her Family -
Trump Mobile T1 Phone Resurfaces With New Specs, Higher Price -
Factory Explosion In North China Leaves Eight Dead -
Blac Chyna Opens Up About Her Kids: ‘Disturb Their Inner Child' -
Winter Olympics 2026: Milan Protestors Rally Against The Games As Environmentally, Economically ‘unsustainable’ -
How Long Is The Super Bowl? Average Game Time And Halftime Show Explained -
Natasha Bure Makes Stunning Confession About Her Marriage To Bradley Steven Perry -
ChatGPT Caricature Prompts Are Going Viral. Here’s List You Must Try -
James Pearce Jr. Arrested In Florida After Alleged Domestic Dispute, Falcons Respond -
Cavaliers Vs Kings: James Harden Shines Late In Cleveland Debut Win -
2026 Winter Olympics Snowboarding: Su Yiming Wins Bronze And Completes Medal Set