SHC seeks comments on plea against licence fee increase for certain drugs
The Sindh High Court has directed drug regulatory authority and its policy board to file comments on a petition against the imposition of a 100 per cent increase in licence fees for the manufacturing of certain drugs.
The pharmaceutical manufacturers association and others have challenged the DRAP’s notification in which the licence fees for the manufacturing of certain drugs has been increased by 100 per cent.
The petitioners’ counsel submitted that the impugned notification was illegal and imposed unreasonable restrictions on the manufacturers’ business, and that the interests of the petitioners would be prejudiced by it.
He submitted that provisions of the drug regulatory act do not provide legislative parameters or a legislative policy for determining the amount and nature of fees to be levied and no rules have been framed by the respondents in respect of the levy of the fees.
He stated that the drug regulatory law does not lay down any guidelines and there is no definite criterion which DRAP is required to follow while exercising its powers in respect of levy of a fee.
He further argued that DRAP while issuing the impugned notification had exercised complete, unguided discretion, and that the notification was liable to be struck down. The counsel stated that the notification would lead towards an acute shortage of economically priced essential drugs and also all imported drugs, which would have a disastrous impact on the general public access to medicine in the country.
He submitted that due to implementation of the notification, the market would be inundated with low-quality and sub-standard drugs. The court was requested to declare the DRAP notification with regard to increase in the licence fees for certain drugs is illegal and liable to be set aside.
The counsel for DRAP sought time to file comments on the petition. A division bench headed by Mohammad Shafi Siddiqui directed DRAP and others to file comments within two weeks with an advanced copy to the counsel of the petitioners.
-
How Your Body 'suffers' In Back Pain And Simple Way To Fix It -
What Victoria Beckham Really Did At Brooklyn, Nicola’s Wedding Revealed -
Send Your Name To Moon With Nasa’s Artemis Mission: Here’s How -
Zhipu AI, MiniMax Debuts Mask Structural Hurdles For China’s Tech Giants -
‘Stargate Community’: Inside OpenAI’s Plan To Cut AI Data Center Energy Costs -
Could Brooklyn Beckham Drop His Surname Following Family Feud? -
Rachel McAdams Becomes Object Of Jokes At Hollywood Star Of Fame Event -
South Korea's Ex-PM Han Duck-soo Jailed For 23 Years Over Martial Law Crises -
Global Markets On Edge Over Greenland Dispute: Is US Economic Leadership At Risk? -
King, Queen Visit Deadly Train Crash Site -
Oxford Research Warns ChatGPT Reflects Western Worldviews -
UK Inflation Unexpectedly Rises To 3.4% In December, The First Increase In Five Months -
Meghan Markle Set To Take Big Decision On Returning To UK For Invictus Games -
Prince Harry To Leave Britain One Day Earlier Than Expected For THIS Reason -
The Way You Consume Sugar Could Be Affecting Your Health -
Brooklyn Beckham Gets Backing From Vanessa Marcil Amid Feud With Parents