Minimum wage of Rs25,000 challenged in SHC
KARACHI: The Sindh High Court on Tuesday has issued notices to secretary labour and human resource department, and secretary minimum wage board on petition of employers that challenged the fixation of minimum monthly wage of Rs25,000 for unskilled workers by the Sindh government.
The Employers Federation of Pakistan (EFP), and others had submitted a petition alleging Sindh government to score political mileage, announced an increase in minimum wage of the unskilled workers from Rs17,500 to Rs25,000 per month without even initiating statutory requirements as contained in the Sindh Minimum Wages Act. They informed the court that they had earlier raised objections against the recommendations of the Sindh Minimum Wages Board on various legal and factual grounds but they were not invited in the board meeting to decide the minimum wage.
The petitioners said the EFP, however, after consultation with the members, informed the government that they were agreed to increase the minimum wage from Rs17,500 to Rs19,000 per month. But instead of considering the employers’ offer, the Sindh government had issued an impugned notification by fixing the minimum wage of Rs25,000 per month for unskilled workers, while secretary labour did not send a proposal to fix minimum wage of Rs25,000 to the board. They submitted that as many as 43 percent increase in minimum wage was irrational and without any legal consideration, which would have consequential effect in terms of variable cost on account of allowances, leave bonuses and gratuity etc.
The EFP and others pleaded the court that besides increasing the minimum wage of unskilled workers, it would also invoke a proportionate increase in the wages of other workers’ categories that might disrupt the entire compensation structure. They said it would adversely impact even amounting to closure of business, submitting that the minimum wage in other provinces has been fixed Rs20,000 per month from July 1 and the fixation of Rs25,000 in Sindh would place the petitioners in the most uncompetitive and disadvantageous position.
The petitioners pleaded the court to declare the impugned notification as unlawful and requested to suspend the implementation of notification till the decision of the petition. The SHC has issued notices to the secretary labour, minimum wage board and advocate general, directing them to submit their comments on August 6.
-
King Charles Prepares Next Move As Andrew Shows No Remorse -
Epstein's Brother Invited To Discuss Royal Family's Future After Andrew's Arrest, On Popular Show -
BAFTA Winner Robert Aramayo Defends Director's Racial Slurs Amid Tics -
Prince William, Kate Middleton’s Troubles Take On A New Face: ‘They’re Steeling Themselves’ -
'Coronation Street' Star Sally Ann Matthews Finally Reveals Why She Quit ITV Soap -
Prince Andrew's Major Sacrifice For Princess Beatrice, Eugenie Royal Titles Revealed -
ICE Agent Misfired Bullet Into Minnesota Hotel’s Guest Room -
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, Fergie Still Counting On Each Other? Deets -
Piers Morgan Reacts To Photo With Ghislaine Maxwell -
UK Data Privacy Regulators Raises Safety Concerns, Warn Against AI-generated Images -
Australian PM Agrees With King Charles, Backs Removing Andrew From Line Of Succession -
Kate Middleton, Prince William 'steeling Themselves' For Harry's Inevitable Arrival With Lilibet, Archie -
Kiefer Sutherland's Arrest Sparks Fresh Fears As Friends 'beg Him' To Get Help After Father's Death -
John Davidson 2026 BAFTA Backlash: Tourettes Action Charity Defends Him Over 'unintentional' Racial Slur -
Kim Kardashian Obsessed TV Star 'Lip King' Breathes His Last At 32 -
Prince Harry Backtracks On Privacy Fears For Princess Lilibet: Here’s Why Public Saw Her Face Amid Andrew Drama