Supporters say Musharraf denied justice
LONDON: Former president General (R) Pervez Musharraf’s supports allege that he has been treated unfairly and that he doesn’t deserve death sentence after being tried under Article 6 of the Constitution for high treason.
Activists of All Pakistan Muslim League (APML) gathered outside the Pakistan High Commission to “demand justice for Pervez Musharraf” and to register condemnation of the “politically motivated” cases against their leader.
Afzal Siddiqui, President APML Overseas; Saeed Bhatti, President APML UK; Asif Shahzad, Adam Gheeasuddin, General Secretary APML UK; Fehmeeda Abbasi, President Women Wing APML UK, Altaf Shahid and others led the protest.
Raising slogans in support of Musharraf, they said the ex-president had brought a lot of development to Pakistan and under him the country earned respect in the world.
They claimed that Musharraf’s years in power were a “golden era” of Pakistan and he dealt with terrorism effectively.
The protestors said the verdict delivered by the Islamabad Special Court against Musharraf was unfair.
Afzal Siddiqui said the APML condemned paragraph 66 of the Special Court verdict.
He claimed that Musharraf was not given the right to a fair trial and the way this trial was initiated and conducted showed that it had always been an exercise of “revenge”.
He criticised former chief justice of Pakistan Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry for instructing the government to invoke Article 6 against Musharraf. He said it became clear when a Supreme Court judge openly mocked the former president.
Siddiqui said, “The political, fabricated and fraudulent nature of the case may also be gauged from the fact that it was hastily concluded without hearing the former president, sentencing him in absentia, restricting the latter from presenting evidence and by aggressively dismissing the noble efforts of the law minister and the attorney general for remedying earlier serious politicised legal shortcomings. The new prosecution team was not even granted the time to study the case.”
A petition presented to diplomats at the Pakistan High Commission said holding the Constitution in abeyance was not an offence according to the Pakistani constitution in 2007. Only later in 2010 through the 18th Amendment, the text of Article 6 was modified to make abeyance of the constitution an offense, it said.
The petition thanked Imran Khan’s government “for parting ways with the previous regime and for taking steps to ensure fairness”.
It added: “We ask to declare null and void this bizarre Special Court judgment and reject all malicious attempts to label Pervez Musharraf a ‘traitor’.
The honourable Pervez Musharraf has fought wars for Pakistan and was the beloved Chief of Pakistan Army. His tenure witnessed unprecedented growth of the Pakistani economy and led to the betterment of the Pakistani people. Pervez Musharraf can never be a traitor.”
-
Queen Camilla Supports Charity's Work On Cancer With Latest Visit -
Dove Cameron Opens Up About Her Latest Gig Alongside Avan Jogia -
Petition Against Blake Lively PGA Letter Gains Traction After Texts With Taylor Swift Revealed -
Netflix Revises Warner Bros. Deal To $83 Billion: All-cash Offer -
Prince Harry Mentions Ex-girlfriend Chelsy Davy In UK Court -
David, Victoria Beckham 'quietly' Consulting Advisers After Brooklyn Remarks: 'Weighing Every Move' -
Meta's New AI Team Delivered First Key Models -
Prince Harry Defends Friends In London Court -
AI May Replace Researchers Before Engineers Or Sales -
Christina Haack Goes On Romantic Getaway: See With Whom -
Consumers Spend More On AI And Utility Apps Than Mobile Games: Report -
Aircraft Tragedy: Missing Tourist Helicopter Found Near Japan Volcano Crater -
Taylor Swift Lands In Trouble After Blake Lively Texts Unsealed -
'Prince Harry Sees A Lot Of Himself In Brooklyn Beckham' -
Kate Middleton’s Cancer Journey Strengthens Her Commitment To Helping Children -
Gaten Matarazzo Compares 'Stranger Things' Ending To 'Lord Of The Rings'