SHC suspends ex-jail chief, other personnel’s sentences
The Sindh High Court on Monday suspended the sentences of a former jail superintendent and four other officials in the jailbreak case and ordered releasing them on bail.
Former jail superintendent Ghulam Murtaza Sheikh, deputy superintendent Faheem Anwar Memon, assistant superintendent Abdul Rehman Sheikh, Salik Ayaz Sheikh and Rafiq Ahmed Channa along with others were sentenced to two years in imprisonment each by an anti-terrorism court for their negligence that resulted in the escape of the suspected Lashkar-e-Jhangvi militants Shaikh Mohammad Mumtaz and Mohammad Ahmed Khan from the jail premises on June 13, 2017.
They were booked by the police on charges of abetment, disappearance of evidence and harbouring criminals. According to the prosecution, the terrorism suspects of the banned militant outfit, who were involved in several terrorism- related killing cases, had escaped from the judicial complex inside the central prison where they had been brought by jail officials in connection with the hearing of some cases.
The appellants filed appeals against the convictions and requested the court to set aside the trial court order. The appellants’ counsel, Aamir Mansoor Qureshi, Mohammad Farooq and others, submitted that the appellants were falsely implicated in the cases. They submitted that the appellants had nothing to do with the offence of the jailbreak, the escape by the two prisoners and the recovery of prohibited items in the prison.
They sought suspension of sentences as they had already completed a major portion of the sentences and it was unlikely that their appeals would be decided in the near future. They submitted that eight other convicts had already undergone their sentences prior to the decision on their appeals and requested the court to suspend the sentences of the appellants till the appeals were decided.
A division bench headed by Justice Mohammad Iqbal Kalhoro, after hearing the arguments of the counsel, observed that the appeals of the convicts were not likely to be decided in the near future due to a heavy backlog of cases. The court observed that as per the jail roll of the appellants they had undergone a major portion of their sentences.
The court suspended the sentences of the appellants and granted them to bail subject to furnishing a surety of Rs2,00,000 each.
-
King Charles Prepares Next Move As Andrew Shows No Remorse -
Epstein's Brother Invited To Discuss Royal Family's Future After Andrew's Arrest, On Popular Show -
BAFTA Winner Robert Aramayo Defends Director's Racial Slurs Amid Tics -
Prince William, Kate Middleton’s Troubles Take On A New Face: ‘They’re Steeling Themselves’ -
'Coronation Street' Star Sally Ann Matthews Finally Reveals Why She Quit ITV Soap -
Prince Andrew's Major Sacrifice For Princess Beatrice, Eugenie Royal Titles Revealed -
ICE Agent Misfired Bullet Into Minnesota Hotel’s Guest Room -
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, Fergie Still Counting On Each Other? Deets -
Piers Morgan Reacts To Photo With Ghislaine Maxwell -
UK Data Privacy Regulators Raises Safety Concerns, Warn Against AI-generated Images -
Australian PM Agrees With King Charles, Backs Removing Andrew From Line Of Succession -
Kate Middleton, Prince William 'steeling Themselves' For Harry's Inevitable Arrival With Lilibet, Archie -
Kiefer Sutherland's Arrest Sparks Fresh Fears As Friends 'beg Him' To Get Help After Father's Death -
John Davidson 2026 BAFTA Backlash: Tourettes Action Charity Defends Him Over 'unintentional' Racial Slur -
Kim Kardashian Obsessed TV Star 'Lip King' Breathes His Last At 32 -
Prince Harry Backtracks On Privacy Fears For Princess Lilibet: Here’s Why Public Saw Her Face Amid Andrew Drama