SHC suspends ex-jail chief, other personnel’s sentences
The Sindh High Court on Monday suspended the sentences of a former jail superintendent and four other officials in the jailbreak case and ordered releasing them on bail.
Former jail superintendent Ghulam Murtaza Sheikh, deputy superintendent Faheem Anwar Memon, assistant superintendent Abdul Rehman Sheikh, Salik Ayaz Sheikh and Rafiq Ahmed Channa along with others were sentenced to two years in imprisonment each by an anti-terrorism court for their negligence that resulted in the escape of the suspected Lashkar-e-Jhangvi militants Shaikh Mohammad Mumtaz and Mohammad Ahmed Khan from the jail premises on June 13, 2017.
They were booked by the police on charges of abetment, disappearance of evidence and harbouring criminals. According to the prosecution, the terrorism suspects of the banned militant outfit, who were involved in several terrorism- related killing cases, had escaped from the judicial complex inside the central prison where they had been brought by jail officials in connection with the hearing of some cases.
The appellants filed appeals against the convictions and requested the court to set aside the trial court order. The appellants’ counsel, Aamir Mansoor Qureshi, Mohammad Farooq and others, submitted that the appellants were falsely implicated in the cases. They submitted that the appellants had nothing to do with the offence of the jailbreak, the escape by the two prisoners and the recovery of prohibited items in the prison.
They sought suspension of sentences as they had already completed a major portion of the sentences and it was unlikely that their appeals would be decided in the near future. They submitted that eight other convicts had already undergone their sentences prior to the decision on their appeals and requested the court to suspend the sentences of the appellants till the appeals were decided.
A division bench headed by Justice Mohammad Iqbal Kalhoro, after hearing the arguments of the counsel, observed that the appeals of the convicts were not likely to be decided in the near future due to a heavy backlog of cases. The court observed that as per the jail roll of the appellants they had undergone a major portion of their sentences.
The court suspended the sentences of the appellants and granted them to bail subject to furnishing a surety of Rs2,00,000 each.
-
Prince Harry Relationship With King Charles 'not Straightforward,' Says Expert -
Truth Behind Jennifer Lopez's 'rude' Glambot Moment Laid Bare -
Nicole Richie Still Loves This Makeup Trend From Her Teen Years -
Meghan Markle Plans To Hide Behind Kids Over Return To UK -
Dolly Parton Marks Major Milestone As State Governor Honors Her Legacy -
Karley Scott Collins Reacts To Rumours Of Her Dating Keith Urban -
Meghan Markle Sends Shockwaves With Promise Of Chaos: ‘Has The Power To Upset The Royals’ -
Jesy Nelson, Zion Foster Call It Quits Amid Twins' Heartbreaking Diagnosis: Source -
What King Charles Told Princess Diana In Letter Before Wedding? -
David Crosby Said This One Singer Had 'no Talent At All' -
Meghan Markle’s Return Risks Setting Off Something ‘exhausting’ And William, Kate Are Bracing -
Bruce Springsteen Reveals Singer He Finds To Be Greatest Rock And Roll Voice -
Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Ensures Teddy Bear Collection Reaches New Home -
Ben Affleck Recalls 'throwing Up' During 'Armageddon's Final Scene -
Kevin Costner Marks 71st Birthday With Decades-old Throwback Photos -
Why Royal Lodge Fell Into Disarray Under Andrew: Insider Exposes Loophole