PHC restrains commission from ‘harassing’ ex-minister
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Wednesday restrained the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Ehtesab Commission from harassing former provincial minister and Pakistan People’s Party leader Liaqat Shabab and directed that all actions should be taken under the law. A division bench comprising Chief Justice Mazhar Alam Miankhel and Mrs Justice Irshad
By Akhtar Amin
May 21, 2015
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Wednesday restrained the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Ehtesab Commission from harassing former provincial minister and Pakistan People’s Party leader Liaqat Shabab and directed that all actions should be taken under the law.
A division bench comprising Chief Justice Mazhar Alam Miankhel and Mrs Justice Irshad Qaisar allowed the commission to continue inquiry into the assets of the former provincial minister. However, the court did not pass any restraining order about the arrest of the former provincial minister by the Ehtesab Commission.
The PPP leader and former provincial minister for excise and taxation Liaqat Shabab had filed the writ petition in the PHC through his lawyer Qazi Jawad Ihsanullah, seeking restraining order from the court regarding his arrest by Ehtesab Commission.
The former minister moved the high court after the Ehtesab Commission officials conducted raids for his arrest in the assets case, claiming that some of his assets were disproportionate to his known sources of income.
In arguments of the case, the petitioner’s lawyer submitted that first the Ehtesab Commission issued a call of notice to the former provincial minister, asking him to appear and record his statement about investigation into embezzlement by the officers of the Excise and Taxation.
He contended that when the minister appeared for recording his statement, the investigation officer Ehtesab Commission served him a pro forma, asking him to mention his all assets. He said that under Section 30 of Ehtesab Commission Act, the director general on the recommendation of the prosecutor general of Ehtesab Commission and director of the Investigation Wing, on receipt of information can ask any public officeholder or any other person regarding his assets disproportionate to the known sources of income.
The lawyer pointed out that in this case, procedure under Section 30 of the Act was not followed and the investigation officer in violation of the act asked the petitioner to give all the details of his assets. The Ehtesab Commission had conducted two raids on the house of former provincial minister in Nowshera district, but he was not found at his house.
A division bench comprising Chief Justice Mazhar Alam Miankhel and Mrs Justice Irshad Qaisar allowed the commission to continue inquiry into the assets of the former provincial minister. However, the court did not pass any restraining order about the arrest of the former provincial minister by the Ehtesab Commission.
The PPP leader and former provincial minister for excise and taxation Liaqat Shabab had filed the writ petition in the PHC through his lawyer Qazi Jawad Ihsanullah, seeking restraining order from the court regarding his arrest by Ehtesab Commission.
The former minister moved the high court after the Ehtesab Commission officials conducted raids for his arrest in the assets case, claiming that some of his assets were disproportionate to his known sources of income.
In arguments of the case, the petitioner’s lawyer submitted that first the Ehtesab Commission issued a call of notice to the former provincial minister, asking him to appear and record his statement about investigation into embezzlement by the officers of the Excise and Taxation.
He contended that when the minister appeared for recording his statement, the investigation officer Ehtesab Commission served him a pro forma, asking him to mention his all assets. He said that under Section 30 of Ehtesab Commission Act, the director general on the recommendation of the prosecutor general of Ehtesab Commission and director of the Investigation Wing, on receipt of information can ask any public officeholder or any other person regarding his assets disproportionate to the known sources of income.
The lawyer pointed out that in this case, procedure under Section 30 of the Act was not followed and the investigation officer in violation of the act asked the petitioner to give all the details of his assets. The Ehtesab Commission had conducted two raids on the house of former provincial minister in Nowshera district, but he was not found at his house.
-
Charlie Puth Explains Why He Went Against His Own Words About 'Hero' -
Popular Weight-loss Drugs Could Help Treat Addiction -
Brooklyn Beckham In ‘terrible Spot’ Like Prince Harry After Airing Family Drama -
A$AP Rocky Reveals Real Reason Behind Feud With Drake -
Stroke During Pregnancy Linked To Long-term Heart Problems -
Trump Backs Off European Tariffs Threat After Reaching ‘framework Of A Future Deal’ On Greenland With NATO -
South Korea Passes World’s First Comprehensive AI Law, Reshaping Global Regulation -
‘Disgraced’ Andrew’s New Demands Exposed As He Moves Out Of Royal Lodge -
Court Allows TikTok To Operate In Canada Pending Review -
Kyle Richards Lashes Out At Ashley Darby For Flirting With Ex Mauricio Umansky -
Chris Noth Breaks Silence On Fallout With Sarah Jessica Parker: 'We're Not Friends' -
Prince Harry, Meghan Markle Show Awkward Mismatch In Viral Video -
Madelyn Cline Surprises With Chic New Hairstyle -
Amelia Gray Gushes About Megan Trainor, Ben Platt -
Prince Harry On Moment Meghan Markle Made Him Feel Like A ‘teenager’ -
Zayn Malik Debuts Four Unreleased Songs At Vegas Residency Premiere