jealousies and callousness. The country was ablaze during the last few days. It should not have happened, wishes every concerned citizen. Those who were behind all this should not be spared particularly those who created the mess by design. Even those contributing to this chaos and social fragmentation by default, can’t be easily absolved, given the sensitivities involved.
But the overall picture of apathy, drawn by certain parties, groups and individuals in politics, towards the nation and towards the citizenry proved to be appalling. Why it was demanded by the Opposition that the government should have approached them for ensuring relief, peace and tranquility in the society?
Is prevalence of peace not the duty of every political force that leads a small or big segment of the society? Perhaps the people in Opposition were happy over the widely and rapidly spreading fire (strife, in fact) because it meant trouble for the government that stood straitjacketed for obvious reasons. For sure, the government and the forces under its command, could never forcefully apply the state might on protesters staging sit-ins and protests on such a delicate issue. The sitting government understood the delicacy of the situation for which it also earned bad titles like ‘surrender of state’, ‘weak government’ and so on and so forth. But the question arises that in case of such a scenario emerging in the future, what should be the role of the plethora of political parties and groups including religious-cum-political parties?
Should they continue waiting for such situations to turn into a nationwide inferno, without taking any initiative by themselves? Or should they wait for the government to kneel down before them and seek their help?
In the civilized world, everyone plays his role with sincerity and speedily without waiting for the government to solicit support because the country belongs to all, the Opposition as well as the government. The government of any party is just a temporary phase of governance entrusted to a certain group of politicians through public mandate. The parties come and go in power. Today it is PML-N government, tomorrow it may be that of PTI, PPP or for that matter that of PML-Q. What should be the underlying principle of dealing with sensitive issues?
The only logical answer to the last question is: ‘Do not leave the government alone’ (Note: The government means any government elected by the people for a given, mandated timeframe).
Students are accused of passport tampering and attempting to illegally settle in UK
Amendments specifically relate to sections 17, 18 and 20 of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Sentencing Act, 2021
Petition filed by Barrister Salman Safdar has taken stance that NAB maliciously misused its powers
An official field survey and demarcation ordered by SHC also confirmed land’s status as state-owned
Irfan remarks this is same prisoner who, even during his tenure as PM, never attended any parliamentary forum on...
According to railway officials, bogies bear bullet marks, and most of windows are shattered