SHC moved against crackdown on social media activists
The Sindh High Court issued on Wednesday notices to the interior secretary, the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) and others on a petition against the ongoing crackdown on social media activists.
Nazim Haji, Ghazi Salahuddin and other petitioners submitted in their plea that political and social media activists were detained and arrested by the FIA for what the authority claimed were investigations or as part of a crackdown on alleged ‘anti-military’ campaigners.
The petitioners observed that criticism of the armed forces did not, by itself, amount to a criminal offence and citizens could not be subjected to any coercive action by the state.
They contended that it was a citizen’s right in a democratic country to criticise each and every branch of the government, and such rights were essential in order to ensure good governance.
The petitioners maintained that it was not up to any branch of the government to decide on its own whether a particular expression of criticism was warranted or otherwise.
Detentions, arrests and seizure of devices, they added, over vague charges by the FIA without any lawful authority, more so without FIRs and warrants, were a violation of the due process of law guaranteed under articles 4, 10-A and 13 of the Constitution of Pakistan, as well as under the relevant provisions of the FIA Act and the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) read with the Criminal Procedure Code, 1898.
They submitted that these actions amounted to coercive acts to intimidate, harass and threaten not just targeted individuals but citizens at large.
The petitioners maintained that the government and the FIA, through both their statements and their actions, had created an effect on freedom of speech and deliberately hindered the public exercise of the rights guaranteed under Article 19 of the Constitution by obstructing the right of citizens to even engage in constructive criticism.
They submitted that government institutions and officials must respect and uphold rights, liberties and the public freedom as guaranteed to citizens under the Constitution of Pakistan, and act in accordance with the law.
They requested the court to restrain the government agencies, including the FIA, from taking any coercive action against social media activists and act strictly in accordance with the law.
Headed by Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, the SHC division bench, after preliminary hearing of the petition, issued notices to the federal interior ministry, the FIA and others to submit comments by June 15.
-
King Charles Prepares Next Move As Andrew Shows No Remorse -
Epstein's Brother Invited To Discuss Royal Family's Future After Andrew's Arrest, On Popular Show -
BAFTA Winner Robert Aramayo Defends Director's Racial Slurs Amid Tics -
Prince William, Kate Middleton’s Troubles Take On A New Face: ‘They’re Steeling Themselves’ -
'Coronation Street' Star Sally Ann Matthews Finally Reveals Why She Quit ITV Soap -
Prince Andrew's Major Sacrifice For Princess Beatrice, Eugenie Royal Titles Revealed -
ICE Agent Misfired Bullet Into Minnesota Hotel’s Guest Room -
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, Fergie Still Counting On Each Other? Deets -
Piers Morgan Reacts To Photo With Ghislaine Maxwell -
UK Data Privacy Regulators Raises Safety Concerns, Warn Against AI-generated Images -
Australian PM Agrees With King Charles, Backs Removing Andrew From Line Of Succession -
Kate Middleton, Prince William 'steeling Themselves' For Harry's Inevitable Arrival With Lilibet, Archie -
Kiefer Sutherland's Arrest Sparks Fresh Fears As Friends 'beg Him' To Get Help After Father's Death -
John Davidson 2026 BAFTA Backlash: Tourettes Action Charity Defends Him Over 'unintentional' Racial Slur -
Kim Kardashian Obsessed TV Star 'Lip King' Breathes His Last At 32 -
Prince Harry Backtracks On Privacy Fears For Princess Lilibet: Here’s Why Public Saw Her Face Amid Andrew Drama