PTI strategy

By Editorial Board
November 02, 2025
Supporters and activists of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) hold flags at a rally in Peshawar. — AFP/File
Supporters and activists of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) hold flags at a rally in Peshawar. — AFP/File

The PTI is caught in a quagmire, not only grappling with mounting legal and political challenges but also reeling from internal divisions that have, in recent weeks, spilled into the public eye. The party’s leadership faces a more immediate existential crisis: internal discord that risks undermining its political future. A striking example of this internal rift emerged recently in the form of a Twitter spat between the PTI secretary general and party members. The exchange, which played out in the open, highlights not only the dysfunctionality within the PTI but also the apparent disregard for Imran Khan’s leadership at a time when party unity is more crucial than ever. Meanwhile, another controversy has erupted regarding the removal of the PTI’s Central Punjab president. All this has led to growing speculation among party workers: Are PTI leaders acting on Imran’s directives, or are they manipulating his name to serve their own interests?

These internal rifts are not new, but they have certainly intensified. There have long been competing factions within the PTI, with conflicts over everything from the composition of the list of people allowed to meet Imran Khan in prison to disagreements about the allocation of party offices. Social media, which once served as a powerful tool for the PTI’s grassroots mobilisation, has now become a battlefield for internal power struggles. According to some former PTI leaders, the current leadership has no coherent strategy for securing Imran’s release. Instead of looking for ways to de-escalate tensions and engage with the establishment, they allege, the leadership is preoccupied with its own internecine struggles. This critique is echoed by many observers who argue that the PTI’s attention has shifted from the strategic goal of securing Imran’s release to futile confrontations that have only polarised the party further. They also point out that the PTI’s attempts to rally the masses through agitation have failed to yield tangible results. The reliance on external actors, such as Trump’s supposed support for Imran’s release, proved to be equally unfruitful. Further complicating matters is the PTI’s failure to form a united opposition front, a crucial misstep given the current political climate.

The potential for a fresh round of street protests led by the PTI in the form of a march towards Islamabad, perhaps spearheaded by Khyber Pakhtunkhwa’s new Chief Minister Sohail Afridi, has been speculated. However, with no formal confirmation of such a move, it remains unclear whether the PTI intends to continue down the path of agitation. The party really needs to step back and reassess its political strategy. The emphasis must shift from internal squabbles and personality-driven conflicts to a broader, more cohesive strategy aimed at addressing the country’s most pressing issues. A united opposition, focused on key issues, can bring real pressure to bear on the government. Equally important is the need for dialogue. Confrontation without negotiation will only lead to further entrenchment on both sides, making it even harder for the PTI to gain any ground. The party must recognise that it is facing a critical juncture in its political journey. Internal division and a lack of strategic focus have already cost it valuable time and opportunities. Moving forward, it must prioritise unity, rethink its approach to governance and opposition politics and adopt a more strategic and pragmatic path to address the national issues that resonate with the electorate.