Sylvester Stallone turns down 'Intentional Dissipation' of assets in divorce
The former couple have been married since May 1997 and share three adult daughters—Sophia, Sistine Stallone, and Scarlet Stallone
Hollywood actor Sylvester Stallone is responding to Jennifer Flavin's divorce filing.
Court documents seen by a celebrity gossip website on Monday revealed that the Rocky star Stallone, 76, turned down Flavin's accusations that he "engaged in the intentional dissipation, depletion and/or waste of marital assets which has had an adverse economic impact on the marital estate."
Stallone's legal team wrote in his response that he "has not engaged" in that type of behavior.
The actor also opposed Flavin's request to have "exclusive use" of their Palm Beach home, reported People.
On Aug. 19, Jennifer filed for divorce from the Expendables actor in a Florida court. Stallone’s rep. quoted the actor as saying in a statement, "I love my family. We are amicably and privately addressing these personal issues."
The former couple have been married since May 1997 and share three adult daughters—Sophia, Sistine Stallone, 24, and Scarlet Stallone, 20.
-
Jimmy Kimmel fires back at Robert F. Kennedy Jr amid Stephen Colbert show fallout
-
Sarah Drew tackles 'big fears' with her father's one piece of advice
-
Eric André reveals Netflix's demand to unlock his account
-
Lisa Ann Walter shares excitement about her new comedy show 'It Was an Accident'
-
Phil Collins gives hopeful update after years of serious health problems
-
Force strikes back as 'The Mandalorian and Grogu' hauls jaw-dropping box office figure
-
Katie Price posts late-night messages while Lee Andrews remains unaccounted for
-
Kim Kardashian once warned Drake on social media over family 'threats'
-
Sebastian Stan drops three-word reaction for terrifying Two-Face look in 'The Batman Part II'
-
Daniel Radcliffe reveals rare public freedom after years of keeping low profile
-
Lee Andrews mystery takes another twist after reported phone activity
-
'Industry' season 4 made HBO heads deeply 'uncomfortable', but why?