US court rules White House must comply with Presidential Records Act
The ruling rejects a Justice Department opinion and affirms Congress’s authority to regulate presidential records under the 1978 law
In a latest U.S. court ruling on Wednesday, U.S. District Judge John Bates concluded that the 1978 statute is likely constitutional and granted a preliminary injunction that essentially nullifies the opinion issued last month by DOJ’s Office of Legal Counsel.
A federal judge has ordered aides to President Donald Trump to continue to observe the requirements of the Presidential Records Act, despite a Justice Department opinion that found the law unconstitutionally intrudes on presidential power.
“The original public meaning of the text of the Constitution, canons of interpretation, Supreme Court precedent, general principles of property law, and almost 50 years of practice confirm that Congress has the enumerated power to regulate presidential records under the Constitution’s Property Clause,” Bates wrote.
Bates, a George W. Bush appointee, faulted the OLC opinion for relying on a “stark misreading” of Supreme Court precedent. He also rejected the Justice Department’s arguments that the law is unconstitutional because presidential papers were considered the personal property of the president until the 1970s.
He also noted that the Trump administration observed the law without objection during his first term.
Bates acted on a pair of lawsuits filed last month by groups representing historians, transparency advocates, and journalists.
“This ruling fundamentally misunderstands the administration's position, and we are confident that we will ultimately prevail.” White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said in a statement. She said the White House does not allow aides to delete electronic records and will continue to enforce that policy.
Additionally, the judge’s order takes effect May 26, giving the Trump administration less than a week to try to get a higher court to step in. It’s unclear how uniformly the administration has been observing the DOJ opinion, since the National Archives continues to make records of prior presidents available under the law.
-
Trump says US and Iran are 'right on the borderline' of a deal
-
Growing Ebola outbreak leaves nearly 140 dead, surpasses 600 suspected cases: WHO
-
UK parliamentary election set for june 18 as major leadership change looms
-
Nancy update: Porch Guy was 'pawn', hidden network behind kidnapping
-
Iran warns of conflict ‘beyond the region’ if US and Israel resume strikes
-
Xi welcomes ‘old friend’ Vladimir Putin in Beijing and secures major agreements
-
How Trump’s banking Immigration status order could create new financial barriers for Immigrants?
-
Trump signs order to combat illicit financial activity in the US financial system
-
Nancy Guthrie kidnapping mystery deepens after retired FBI agent reveals shocking DNA theory
-
Keisha Lance Bottoms aims to make history as first Black woman governor in US
-
Severe thunderstorm watch issued as strong winds and heavy rain threaten Ohio
-
Iran war is hurting poorer countries the most, UN warns in new report
