US court rules White House must comply with Presidential Records Act
The ruling rejects a Justice Department opinion and affirms Congress’s authority to regulate presidential records under the 1978 law
In a latest U.S. court ruling on Wednesday, U.S. District Judge John Bates concluded that the 1978 statute is likely constitutional and granted a preliminary injunction that essentially nullifies the opinion issued last month by DOJ’s Office of Legal Counsel.
A federal judge has ordered aides to President Donald Trump to continue to observe the requirements of the Presidential Records Act, despite a Justice Department opinion that found the law unconstitutionally intrudes on presidential power.
“The original public meaning of the text of the Constitution, canons of interpretation, Supreme Court precedent, general principles of property law, and almost 50 years of practice confirm that Congress has the enumerated power to regulate presidential records under the Constitution’s Property Clause,” Bates wrote.
Bates, a George W. Bush appointee, faulted the OLC opinion for relying on a “stark misreading” of Supreme Court precedent. He also rejected the Justice Department’s arguments that the law is unconstitutional because presidential papers were considered the personal property of the president until the 1970s.
He also noted that the Trump administration observed the law without objection during his first term.
Bates acted on a pair of lawsuits filed last month by groups representing historians, transparency advocates, and journalists.
“This ruling fundamentally misunderstands the administration's position, and we are confident that we will ultimately prevail.” White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said in a statement. She said the White House does not allow aides to delete electronic records and will continue to enforce that policy.
Additionally, the judge’s order takes effect May 26, giving the Trump administration less than a week to try to get a higher court to step in. It’s unclear how uniformly the administration has been observing the DOJ opinion, since the National Archives continues to make records of prior presidents available under the law.
-
Multiple BC communities set new temperature records amid heat wave
-
China targets 50% growth in wind and solar power generation by 2030
-
University of Toronto professor wins prestigious Fields Medal, known as the ‘Nobel Prize of Mathematics’
-
Carney vows action as Canada prepares response to Trump’s 50 percent tariffs
-
Father jailed after failing to pay more than $37,000 in child support
-
Markwayne Mullin facing growing tensions with Trump White House, report says
-
US targets cybercriminals with new visa restriction policy
-
Nancy Guthrie's chilling first ransom note details revealed
-
Oil surges above $100 as Red Sea attacks stoke fears of wider Iran conflict
-
Trump reveals key condition for US-Saudi nuclear deal
-
Rubio says US remains committed to ending Ukraine war after high-stakes meeting with Lavrov
-
US senator demands answers from Barclays over Jes Staley’s ties to Jeffrey Epstein
