USPS stamp price hike proposed as first-class mail could rise to 82 cents amid financial crisis
The agency said the move is necessary to address rising operational expenses and ongoing financial pressure
The United States Postal Service has proposed a stamp price hike that would raise the cost of a First-Class Mail Forever stamp to 82 cents, citing a “severe financial crisis”.
According to CNBC, the proposed increase of four cents would take effect on July 12 if approved by the Postal Regulatory Commission.
Overall, mailing costs would rise by about 4.8 percent under the plan.
The agency said the move is necessary to address rising operational expenses and ongoing financial pressure.
“The Postal Service is using all available tools, including available regulatory pricing authority, to ensure we can continue to fulfill our universal service obligation and serve the American public,” it said in a press release.
The proposal follows a separate plan to introduce an 8 per cent fuel surcharge on package and express deliveries, linked to higher fuel costs amid the Iran war.
Postmaster General David Steiner previously warned lawmakers that the agency could run out of cash “in less than 12 months” at current spending levels.
Unlike other federal entities, the Postal Service does not rely on taxpayer funding and instead operates through revenue from its services.
The proposed price hike now awaits regulatory approval before it can take effect.
-
3 Palestinians killed in Israeli drone strike at occupied West Bank
-
Trump vs Britain over Falklands: What’s behind the new threat?
-
Friends claim Prince William, Kate determined to 'look forward to the future' as Meghan, Harry return
-
Iceland EU referendum: Voters decide whether to restart membership talks
-
Ecuador court sentences former president Moreno to five years for corruption
-
Alberta’s Danielle Smith to meet US officials despite US-Canada trade tensions
-
Royal fans react as Sarah Ferguson 'plans to move back to Britain'
-
US revises Chinese hack claims after China hits back over ‘state-sponsored’ charges
