South Korea's Yoon defies summons third time in a row
Impeached president faces criminal charges of insurrection, which can result in life imprisonment, death penalty
SEOUL: South Korean suspended President Yoon Suk Yeol refused a summons to appear for questioning on Sunday, the third time he has defied investigators' demands in two weeks.
At 10am on Sunday, investigators probing Yoon had ordered him to appear for questioning, a demand he rejected.
Yoon, a former prosecutor, also failed to attend a hearing he was summoned to last Wednesday, giving no explanation for his absence.
The conservative leader was stripped of his duties by parliament on December 14, following a short-lived martial law declaration that plunged the country into its worst political crisis in decades.
Yoon faces impeachment and criminal charges of insurrection, which could result in life imprisonment or even the death penalty, in a drama that has shocked democratic South Korea's allies around the world.
"President Yoon Suk Yeol did not appear at the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials (CIO) at 10am today," said the office in a statement.
"The Joint Investigation Headquarters will review and decide on future measures," it added.
The CIO is expected to decide in the coming days whether to issue a fourth summons or ask a court to grant an arrest warrant to compel Yoon to appear for questioning.
He is being investigated by prosecutors as well as a joint team comprising police, defence ministry, and anti-corruption officials, while the Constitutional Court deliberates on the impeachment motion passed by parliament.
If upheld by the court, which is required to deliver its ruling within six months of the impeachment, a by-election must be held within 60 days of the court's decision.
Former president Park Geun-hye was impeached under similar circumstances, but she was investigated only after the Constitutional Court removed her from power.
A 10-page prosecutors' report seen by AFP stated that Yoon Suk Yeol authorised the military to fire their weapons if needed to enter parliament during his failed bid to impose martial law.
-
‘Sure, there’s a reason’: Epstein survivor reacts to Melania Trump’s surprise White House address
-
US trade court reviews legality of Trump’s 10% global tariff
-
Japan protests New Zealand ‘comfort women’ statue, warns of diplomatic fallout
-
Sobeys cheese recall: multiple products pulled due to possible listeria contamination
-
USPS stamp price hike proposed as first-class mail could rise to 82 cents amid financial crisis
-
Snowbirds continue Florida trips despite travel shift as others avoid US amid economic tensions
-
Detection dog at Toronto airport uncovers large stash of undeclared meat in passenger luggage
-
Doug Ford says he will work with any federal government, as Liberals near majority
-
Candace Owens targeted as Trump attacks former allies over Iran war
-
Artemis II splashdown time set as NASA prepares for high-speed return and recovery mission
-
Melania Trump denies Epstein ties, says contact with him and Ghislaine Maxwell was only ‘casual’
-
Abbas Araghchi says US would be 'dumb' to let Israel undermine ceasefire amid Lebanon violence