PHC adjourns hearing in petitions against Reforms Act
By our correspondents
December 04, 2015
PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court (PHC) adjourned the hearing into the writ petitions against the Medical Teaching Institution Reforms Act 2015 in the teaching hospitals of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa till Monday.
A larger bench headed by PHC Chief Justice Mazhar Alam Miankhel was hearing the petitions challenging the act. The counsel representing the teaching hospitals, Syed Arshad Ali, said petitioners had given the impression that the act would curtail the autonomy of the hospitals that is against the fact.
He said that reforms had been introduced in the 2015 act and the chief executive’s posts were abolished which was replaced by the board of governors. He added that the BoG members were appointed from the private sector on the recommendation of the search and nomination committee. He contended that health director and medical directors were barred from private practice.
Another counsel for the MTI, Ishaq Ali Qazi, told the court that the new act was meant for providing better health services to the masses and protecting their interests.Advocate General Abdul Latif Yousafzai informed the court that the act was introduced after all constitutional requirements were fulfilled.
He said that the MTI act was not in violation of the basic constitutional rights therefore the court should dispose off the petition. The court adjourned the hearing till Monday.
A larger bench headed by PHC Chief Justice Mazhar Alam Miankhel was hearing the petitions challenging the act. The counsel representing the teaching hospitals, Syed Arshad Ali, said petitioners had given the impression that the act would curtail the autonomy of the hospitals that is against the fact.
He said that reforms had been introduced in the 2015 act and the chief executive’s posts were abolished which was replaced by the board of governors. He added that the BoG members were appointed from the private sector on the recommendation of the search and nomination committee. He contended that health director and medical directors were barred from private practice.
Another counsel for the MTI, Ishaq Ali Qazi, told the court that the new act was meant for providing better health services to the masses and protecting their interests.Advocate General Abdul Latif Yousafzai informed the court that the act was introduced after all constitutional requirements were fulfilled.
He said that the MTI act was not in violation of the basic constitutional rights therefore the court should dispose off the petition. The court adjourned the hearing till Monday.
-
Queen Camilla Supports Charity's Work On Cancer With Latest Visit -
Dove Cameron Opens Up About Her Latest Gig Alongside Avan Jogia -
Petition Against Blake Lively PGA Letter Gains Traction After Texts With Taylor Swift Revealed -
Netflix Revises Warner Bros. Deal To $83 Billion: All-cash Offer -
Prince Harry Mentions Ex-girlfriend Chelsy Davy In UK Court -
David, Victoria Beckham 'quietly' Consulting Advisers After Brooklyn Remarks: 'Weighing Every Move' -
Meta's New AI Team Delivered First Key Models -
Prince Harry Defends Friends In London Court -
AI May Replace Researchers Before Engineers Or Sales -
Christina Haack Goes On Romantic Getaway: See With Whom -
Consumers Spend More On AI And Utility Apps Than Mobile Games: Report -
Aircraft Tragedy: Missing Tourist Helicopter Found Near Japan Volcano Crater -
Taylor Swift Lands In Trouble After Blake Lively Texts Unsealed -
'Prince Harry Sees A Lot Of Himself In Brooklyn Beckham' -
Kate Middleton’s Cancer Journey Strengthens Her Commitment To Helping Children -
Gaten Matarazzo Compares 'Stranger Things' Ending To 'Lord Of The Rings'