CJP hints at taking up pleas on polls, military court trials
CJP Qazi may soon take up important cases pending before the Supreme Court (SC) on the holding of general election as well as pleas challenging the trial of May 9 suspects in military courts
ISLAMABAD: Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Qazi Faez Isa may soon take up important cases pending before the Supreme Court (SC) on the holding of general election as well as pleas challenging the trial of May 9 suspects in military courts.
These remarks were made by Justice Isa while he was heading a three-member SC bench hearing the case of Pak-Arab Refinery employees.
During the hearing, when the counsel for the Pak-Arab Refinery employees sought an adjournment for two weeks, the CJP observed that some important petitions would be taken up for hearing soon. Therefore, it would be difficult to hear other cases during that period.
The chief justice told the counsel cases related to the general election as well as pleas challenging the trial of civilians in military courts would be taken up soon, hence his case would be fixed after two months. In August this year, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf requested the Supreme Court to direct the president of Pakistan to announce the date for elections within 90 days of the dissolution of the National Assembly.
Similarly, Supreme Court Bar Association President Abid S Zubairi had also filed the same petition in the apex court. Likewise, Jamaat-e-Islami, through its Naib Ameer Liaquat Baloch, had also filed a petition in the apex court under Article 184(3) of the Constitution, seeking direction to the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) to hold the general election within 90 days from the date of dissolution of National and provincial assemblies as provided in Article 224(2) of the Constitution.
The petitions were filed during Chief Justice Umer Ata Bandial’s tenure but were not fixed for hearing.
Also, pleas of former prime minister and PTI Chairman Imran Khan, former chief justice Jawad S Khwaja and Barrister Aitzaz Ahsan as well as civil society members, challenging the trial of May 9 suspects in military courts were also pending before the apex court. Barrister Aitzaz Ahsan had challenged in the Supreme Court the decision of Pakistan Army taken in a corps commanders meeting on May 15 to try civilians involved in May 9 incidents in military courts, established under the Pakistan Army Act 1952. Filed under Article 184(3) of the Constitution, Aitzaz had prayed the apex court to declare that sections 2(1)(d)(ii) and 59(4) of the Army Act, 1952, are ultra vires the Constitution and void, or in the alternative cannot be invoked for the offences allegedly committed during the May 9 incidents and covered under the various FIRs.
A six-member SC bench had heard the petitions but did not issue a verdict. In the last hearing, the case was adjourned for date-in-office indefinitely after Attorney General for Pakistan Mansoor Usman Awan assured the CJP that the military trials would not proceed without informing the apex court.
-
Dwayne Johnson Confesses What Secretly Scares Him More Than Fame -
Elizabeth Hurley's Son Damian Breaks Silence On Mom’s Romance With Billy Ray Cyrus -
Shamed Andrew Should Be Happy ‘he Is Only In For Sharing Information’ -
Daniel Radcliffe Wants Son To See Him As Just Dad, Not Harry Potter -
Apple Sued Over 'child Sexual Abuse' Material Stored Or Shared On ICloud -
Nancy Guthrie Kidnapped With 'blessings' Of Drug Cartels -
Hailey Bieber Reveals Justin Bieber's Hit Song Baby Jack Is Already Singing -
Emily Ratajkowski Appears To Confirm Romance With Dua Lipa's Ex Romain Gavras -
Leighton Meester Breaks Silence On Viral Ariana Grande Interaction On Critics Choice Awards -
Heavy Snowfall Disrupts Operations At Germany's Largest Airport -
Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Released Hours After Police Arrest -
Heidi Klum Eyes Spooky Season Anthem With Diplo After Being Dubbed 'Queen Of Halloween' -
King Charles Is In ‘unchartered Waters’ As Andrew Takes Family Down -
Why Prince Harry, Meghan 'immensely' Feel 'relieved' Amid Andrew's Arrest? -
Jennifer Aniston’s Boyfriend Jim Curtis Hints At Tensions At Home, Reveals Rules To Survive Fights -
Shamed Andrew ‘dismissive’ Act Towards Royal Butler Exposed