The way history returns

Reading Hannah Arendt in the times of Modi

By Avinash Kumar
|
July 16, 2017

Highlights

  • Reading Hannah Arendt in the times of Modi

"The totalitarian movements aim at and succeed in organizing masses -- not classes, like the old interest parties of the Continental nation-states; not citizens with opinions about, and interests in, handling of public affairs, like the parties of Anglo-Saxon countries."

These lines from Hannah Arendt, the prominent German philosopher, whose masterful work on The Origins of Totalitarianism (first published in 1950) depicting the landscape of totalitarian regimes of Germany and Russia, lays bare the entrails of the way totalitarian regimes work.

Looking at the current world of street thugs, lynching people (mostly Muslims and dalits) and their equally hyper and crass supporters on the social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook in India, one is reminded of how many ways in which history can return to us as a farce, to paraphrase Marx.

Read also:War of narratives

The world of Modi-led India today and the global story of right-wing regimes is feeding on this disinterest in arguments and opinions but an unshakeable faith in prejudices masquerading as ‘belief’. In a recent piece, a prominent Indian columnist argued that the problem with history as a discipline is that it doesn’t try and draw lessons from the past. Works of Arendt highlight how it can be a case of mistaken interpretation.

It will be worthwhile to list out a few things which started as a series of disconnected trends during the previous UPA regime in India, picked up momentum with the ascent of Modi to power, have now reached a crescendo with the election of Yogi Adityanath as the Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh, the largest state in terms of population in north India.

Just a few bullet points should suffice:

Whether it’s ordinary people being forced to stand and die for hours in the queue in front of the banks post-demonetisation, people suddenly being asked to prove their loyalty to an economic measure like GST under the name of ‘one nation, one tax’, or directly on the issue of ‘beef eating’’, terror incidents of everyday are not really one blundering step followed by another.

To quote Hannah Arendt once again, "…within the organisational framework of the movement, so long as it holds together, the fanaticised members can be reached by neither experience nor argument…Total loyalty is possible only when fidelity is emptied of all concrete content, from which changes of mind might naturally arise…every political program which deals with issues more specific than ideological questions of importance for centuries is an obstruction to totalitarianism…" It is this phenomenon, where no ‘facts’ matter and the áge of post-truths’ is proclaimed and history is written everyday through WhatsApp messages.

Hannah Arendt goes on to say, "the practical goal of the movement is to organise as many people as possible within its framework and to set and keep them in motion; a political goal that would constitute the end of the movement simply does not exist."

Hence, whether it’s ordinary people being forced to stand and die for hours in the queue in front of the banks post-demonetisation, people suddenly being asked to prove their loyalty to an economic measure like GST under the name of ‘one nation, one tax’, or directly on the issue of ‘beef eating’’, terror incidents of everyday are not really one blundering step followed by another. They simply feed into each other.

Hence, the more the measures hurt them, the more their faith in the supreme leader becomes stronger, as they are made to believe that against the previous regimes of non-action they all are being part of a huge enterprise, sacrificing for the nation on everyday basis.