SC issues contempt notices to channel staff
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Saturday issued contempt notices to reporters, anchor person, producer, director news and management of Din TV news channel for airing a news item about the alleged meeting between Judge Justice Amir Hani Muslim and PML-N Senator Nehal Hashmi regarding PanamaLeaks case, pending before the court.
Chief Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali directed its office to issue contempt notices to the management and staff of the news channel and any other person(s) behind this mischief immediately for their reply/concise statements and appearance before the court on November 28, 2016 in Islamabad.
The office of the country’s top court clarified that the news item is totally false, baseless, concocted, stage managed and figment of the mind of the reporter.
It said such misleading stories based on character assassination campaigns and casting aspersion on character and conduct of any dignitary through media trial are condemnable that sensationalise a non-issue. The chief justice took strong notice of the issue on the note of registrar that was based on transcript and CD of news package aired by the channel on November 18, 2016.
It was stated that the news channel has maliciously tried to malign the judge and brought on media something which has never happened. This amounts to a dirty attempt to tarnish the image of this august court which is extremely damaging for the judiciary as a whole, a press release issued by the office of the court said.
The press release further stated that this is a clear case of contempt within the meaning of Article 204(2)(b) of the Constitution, read with Section 3, 4 and 17 of the Contempt of Court Ordinance, 2003.
Further, it said, it is a deliberate attempt to damage the reputation of this august court, as the news package has been uploaded on the social media which has elicited unwarranted comments from the public.
The statement said the airing of such news on TV channel about a sub judice matter is nothing but to malign the institution of judiciary and to bring the court and judges into hatred, ridicule or contempt.
It further tends to prejudice the determination of a high profile case. Therefore, it said, the said news channel has tried to obstruct the judicial proceedings being conducted by larger bench of the august court.
-
Celine Dion Remembers Late Hubby René Angélil On His 84th Birthday -
Pregnant Women Fighting 'like Hell' Against Paracetamol? -
Elon Musk Vs OpenAI, Microsoft: Why XAI Founder Seeks $134B In ‘wrongful Gains’ -
Gracie Abrams Lauds Paul Mescal's Performance In 'Hamnet' -
OpenAI Introduces Ad Tests On ChatGPT In The U.S. Ahead Of Broader Revenue Strategy -
Meghan Markle Reveals Princess Lilibet's Hidden Talent -
Prince Archie Actives Prince Harry’s Inner Papa Bear: ‘He Wants To Lock Everything Down’ -
Insurrection Act In Minneapolis? Trump Says 'not Right Now' -
Historic UN Biodiversity Treaty Takes Effect Today, Aiming To Protect 30% Of High Seas By 2030 -
King Salman Leaves Hospital After 'reassuring' Medical Tests -
Michelle Randolph Clears The Air On Dating Rumours With Glen Powell -
Viral 2016 Throwback Trend Taking Over Instagram And TikTok: Here's Why -
Wizards Vs Kings: Domantas Sabonis Returns After 27-game Absence -
Bella Hadid Shares Future Plans Following 'Yellowstone' Success -
NLL Brings Professional Lacrosse Back To Edmonton After 10 Years -
Marcello Hernandez’s Girlfriend: What To Know About Ana Amelia Batlle Cabral