Criteria for post of HEC’s chairperson draws criticism

LAHORE: The Higher Education Commission’s (HEC) recent advertisement for its top leadership post (chairperson) has drawn criticism from education experts, including former Vice Chancellor Prof Dr Asghar Zaidi, who argues that the eligibility criteria may discourage visionary candidates from applying.

Among other concerns raised by the former VC of the Government College University (GCU) Prof Dr Asghar Zaidi and others are related to experience and age. The senior academician took to social media and argued that the required experience for the chairperson was nearly the same as that of a university professor. According to the advertisement issued by the Ministry of Federal Education and Professional Training also available on the HEC website, the Chairperson will be appointed by the Prime Minister for a two-year term, which may be extended once. Applicants must have at least 15 years of experience in higher education, including 10 years after earning a PhD.

They are expected to be internationally recognised scholars with a strong record of research, teaching, and academic leadership.

The age limit for applicants is 65 years. The advertisement emphasises that candidates should have experience in policy formulation, administration, and strategic planning. Applications must be submitted online via the National Job Portal by 10th September 2025.

It is pertinent to mention here that one of the most debated points among the senior academicians is the age limit of 65 years. Many believe this restriction goes beyond what is stated in the HEC Act, which does not mention any age cap. In fact, some previous Chairpersons were over 70 when appointed. According to sources, the age limit may have been added to discourage certain individuals from applying. The age limit of 65 years has also sparked debate. While provincial HECs impose no such restriction, the federal criteria could exclude seasoned professionals with proven track records.

“Leadership should be judged by vision, stamina and track record — not age,” said Prof Zaidi. Talking to The News a number of former and incumbent VCs echoed also these concerns and expressed reservations about the current selection framework.

Another sticking point is the two-year term for the position. Experts argue that such a short tenure undermines the possibility of long-term reforms and strategic planning.

“For a role tasked with setting the strategic direction of higher education, such a short term undermines continuity, institutional reforms, and long-term planning,” Prof Zaidi added. The stakeholders suggest that the government should withdraw the term related restriction which was added in the HEC Act a couple of years back. Similar concerns were also shared by another former VC from Punjab who requested anonymity. Education stakeholders are calling for a rethink of the criteria to attract top-tier talent, including from the global academic community. They stress the need for inclusive, forward-looking leadership that can steer Pakistan’s higher education system toward meaningful progress.