SC can’t alter Constitution, only parliament can: Sanaullah
Sanaullah criticises ruling for granting two more weeks to process independent candidates’ affiliations to their desired political parties
ISLAMABAD: Commenting on the recent Supreme Court’s verdict on reserved seats’ case, Prime Minister’s Adviser on Political and Public Affairs Rana Sanaullah has said that the ruling does not match the clear orders written in the Constitution for independent candidates who are willing to join political parties.
The senior leader of the ruling Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PMLN) criticised the top court’s verdict for which he claimed that it violated Article 51 and relevant clauses which clearly bound independent candidates to join political parties within three days after elections.
Sanaullah was talking to Geo News programme Naya Pakistan on Sunday in which he emphasised that the Constitution provides clear instructions for dealing with independent candidates and the allocation of reserved seats among political parties without any vagueness.
While expressing his views, the senior politico claimed that the top court’s bench mentioned in their joint judgement that the independent candidates would be given 15 days to join political parties, which went above the Constitution.
He also criticised the ruling for granting two more weeks to process the independent candidates’ affiliations to their desired political parties. The PM’s aide also censured that the verdict would be tantamount to “opening the front gate for horse-trading”.
“The judiciary cannot alter the Constitutions, but parliament can,” he added.
Regarding the incarcerated PTI founder’s arrest in new cases, Sanaullah said that Imran Khan would do nothing but spread anarchy and political chaos in the country after coming out of jail.
He added that it would be better not to release the former prime minister to bring political and economic stability to the country. Sanaullah also blamed the PTI for organising the May 9, 2023 riots and running a campaign against the heads of the defence institutions.
He said that the prosecution had an equal right to pursue trials like the former premier possessed the right to defend himself. The lawyer-cum-politician said that no one had stopped the PTI founder from knocking on the doors of the courts against his arrest.
-
Victoria Wood's Battle With Insecurities Exposed After Her Death -
Prince Harry Lands Meghan Markle In Fresh Trouble Amid 'emotional' Distance In Marriage -
Goldman Sachs’ Top Lawyer Resigns Over Epstein Connections -
How Kim Kardashian Made Her Psoriasis ‘almost’ Disappear -
Gemini AI: How Hackers Attempt To Extract And Replicate Model Capabilities With Prompts? -
Palace Reacts To Shocking Reports Of King Charles Funding Andrew’s £12m Settlement -
Megan Fox 'horrified' After Ex-Machine Gun Kelly's 'risky Behavior' Comes To Light -
Prince William's True Feelings For Sarah Ferguson Exposed Amid Epstein Scandal -
Nick Jonas Gets Candid About His Type 1 Diabetes Diagnosis -
King Charles Sees Environmental Documentary As Defining Project Of His Reign -
James Van Der Beek Asked Fans To Pay Attention To THIS Symptom Before His Death -
Portugal Joins European Wave Of Social Media Bans For Under-16s -
Margaret Qualley Recalls Early Days Of Acting Career: 'I Was Scared' -
Sir Jackie Stewart’s Son Advocates For Dementia Patients -
Google Docs Rolls Out Gemini Powered Audio Summaries -
Breaking: 2 Dead Several Injured In South Carolina State University Shooting