close
Thursday March 28, 2024

Asad Umar claims was approached for minus-Imran Khan formula

"This is an incident that took two or three days before the vote of no-confidence," Asad Umar says

By Web Desk
August 08, 2022
Former minister for planning, development and special initiatives Asad Umar addresses PTI supporters during a public gathering meeting held in Kotri, on November 07, 2021. — PPI
Former minister for planning, development and special initiatives Asad Umar addresses PTI supporters during a public gathering meeting held in Kotri, on November 07, 2021. — PPI

ISLAMABAD: I was approached for a minus-Imran Khan formula hours before the no-trust vote against the then-prime minister, senior PTI leader Asad Umar has claimed.

PTI Chairman Khan was removed from office in April through a no-confidence motion and he, to date, claims that it was a US-backed move. However, the then-opposition and the American government both deny the allegations.

Umar, according to Geo News, said: "This is an incident that took place two or three days before the vote of no-confidence. I received a call from Bani Gala, asking me to reach there immediately." 

The former federal minister said some people — whom he refrained from naming — called him towards them upon his arrival at Bani Gala.

"They shared with me this 'brilliant idea' of proposing three names in place of Imran Khan [as the prime minister] and suggested that my name be added to it," Umar said.

In response to their proposal, the ex-federal minister said he told them that they were "out of their minds" as PTI is "nothing" without its chairman, Khan.

Who should be appointed COAS?

Moving on, Umar said that in line with professionalism, the person best to lead the army should be appointed to the office of the chief of army staff (COAS).

"But controversy will stir up if a controversial government appoints an army chief. It's better that a new government, with a fresh mandate, appoint the next chief."

Umar pointed out that in case anyone thinks that if they appoint an army chief, then he will support them, then they have no idea about the history of Pakistan.

"All armed forces' chief, who have directly or indirectly, intervened [in political matters] were the ones who were appointed by the prime ministers [who thought that they might favour them]," he added.