add The News to homescreen

tap to bring up your browser menu and select 'Add to homescreen' to pin the The News web app

Got it!

add The News to homescreen

tap to bring up your browser menu and select 'Add to homescreen' to pin the The News web app

Got it!


Web Desk
January 14, 2020

Guernica 37 says LHC's decision on Musharraf should restore some faith in rule of law

Web Desk
Tue, Jan 14, 2020

LONDON: The International Justice Chambers' Guernica 37 in a statement issued Tuesday welcomed the Lahore High Court's (LHC) January 13 decision   terming the formation of a special court that tried former president Pervez Musharraf for high treason as "unconstitutional."

A notification issued by the body read that the decision "should restore some faith in the rule of law and the criminal judicial system" of Pakistan.

 Praising the incumbent government, it further said the system "has seen monumental changes and greater international cooperation and will continue to be reformed" under Prime Minister Imran Khan.

The specialist barristers' chambers noted that the "circumvention of the rule of law should never and will never be tolerated" and that no one  be "perceived as being beyond the reach of the law."

It underlined that the decision that to sentence Musharraf was  flawed  as it did not grant due rights under  guaranteed under the Constitution of Pakistan's  international treaty obligations.

"There had been a total abandonment of those principles enshrined in the Constitution" and Pakistan's criminal laws," it read.

Guernica 37 also lamented the verdict, saying it was unprecedented and that it was beyond many people's comprehension both morally and legally.

"As noted in an earlier statement, the ruling of the court was unprecedented, and further, in ordering the public desecration of a body, an action that is beyond the comprehension of most, both morally, and legally," it added.

"That is of some concern and is a matter that will need to be properly addressed in terms of the Justices conduct and appropriate disciplinary measures taken against those judicial officers of the court that have taken an oath to uphold the constitution and by their actions have failed to do so."

In a communication on December 20, 2013, the barristers' chambers had sought the UN human rights monitoring mechanism's urgent intervention and "outlined the grave concerns regarding the sanctity of the former President’s Musharraf right to a fair and impartial tribunal, and to a trial free of political machination", the statement added.

That communication had "detailed the serious irregularities of the process and called for a full review by the UN human rights experts" as well as the allegation that former prime minister Nawaz Sharif "misused his powers to bring a final and politically motivated treason charge by setting up a special court and handpicked three judges to try the former President Musharraf".

"That process has now quite properly been declared unconstitutional," it added.

Musharraf's Sentence 

A special court formed to probe the Musharraf high treason case had on December 17, 2019, sentenced the former dictator to death for imposing a state of emergency on November 3, 2007 after finding him guilty of high treason in line with Article 6 of the Constitution of Pakistan.

However, the process was termed as "unconstitutional" by the LHC on January 13, 2020, and ruled that the Constitution's amended Article 6 — under which Musharraf had been found guilty — could not be applied in the case 'ex post facto', or retrospectively. The modification had come via the 18th Amendment in 2010.

The LHC's decision came in response to a petition filed by Musharraf challenging the formation of the special court for the high treason case against him.