Pakistan rethinks TAPI gas pipeline after consultant flags LNG surplus

By Khalid Mustafa
September 05, 2025
Workers stand near a gas pipe during the launching ceremony of construction work of the TAPI project on the Afghan section of a natural gas pipeline that will link Turkmenistan through Afghanistan to Pakistan and India, near the town of Serhetabat, Turkmenistan February 23, 2018. — Reuters
Workers stand near a gas pipe during the launching ceremony of construction work of the TAPI project on the Afghan section of a natural gas pipeline that will link Turkmenistan through Afghanistan to Pakistan and India, near the town of Serhetabat, Turkmenistan February 23, 2018. — Reuters

ISLAMABAD: In a significant development, international energy consultancy Wood Mackenzie has advised the Government of Pakistan to delay any commitment to gas intake from Turkmenistan under the TAPI pipeline project until at least 2031.

This recommendation comes as Pakistan is already facing a surplus of imported LNG, due to a dramatic decline in domestic gas consumption, a senior official from the Ministry of Energy told the scribe.

The advisory has sparked urgent deliberations within the Petroleum Division, where senior officials are now seriously considering either notifying Turkmenistan of a potential deferment or even withdrawing from the $13 billion Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India (TAPI) gas pipeline. The warning comes amid growing challenges in managing Pakistan’s existing LNG contracts and infrastructure.

In parallel with this domestic oversupply crisis, Pakistan is also reassessing its strategic position on TAPI, particularly in light of India’s ongoing indecision. According to senior officials, if India formally withdraws from the project, the pipeline would effectively become TAP (Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan)—a model that Islamabad deems economically unviable.

Without India’s participation, Pakistan would lose an estimated $700–800 million annually in transit fee revenue. Instead, it would be required to pay $500 million per year to Afghanistan for gas transit.

When added to the base gas price of $7.5 per MMBTU, the total cost would exceed the price of even expensive RLNG imports—making the project financially unsustainable.