| I |
n a world increasingly defined by rapid industrial expansion, concrete blocks and consumerist patterns, meeting architect Kamil Khan Mumtaz is like finding an oasis of genuine thought amid the desert of recycled ideas.
Over a cup of tea in a peaceful corner of his workplace, his profound words, cultural insights and extensive architectural experience were thought-provoking. “I found my calling to explore and understand the wisdom of nature, the ecological cycle, nd how this should be part of our architectural design in our city landscape.” He began by recounting his early challenges as an architect and artist. Despite his commitment to rationalism and experimental science, his buildings were misinterpreted as mere replicas of Western modernism. “I was trying to communicate that being modern isn’t about adopting a style, it’s about embracing an attitude,” he said. Every time his work was dismissed as “following the West,” he felt the sting of miscommunication. It was in this misinterpretation that he found his first lesson: that modernity must be reimagined through the lens of local culture.
The turning point for him, he said, came during a seemingly casual conversation with an Iranian architect, Nadir Ertelan, who shared his writings on traditional Persian architecture. That book, titled The Sense of Unity, was a guide to the answers he had been seeking. He realised that the chasm between tradition and modernity was not merely a difference of style or materials but a fundamental divergence in worldviews. “Traditional culture,” he said, “is built on a paradigm that honours its origins. It’s not about rejecting modern ideas, but about recontextualising them within our heritage.”
Kamil Khan’s insights extend far beyond the realm of architecture. His discourse touched upon the deep-seated crisis of our times, the unsustainable exploitation of natural resources and the insatiable appetite for industrial production. With unyielding conviction, he denounced the green-wash tactics of some corporations that hide behind eco-friendly labels while perpetuating a cycle of overconsumption. He discovered that the right path is often the hardest to follow. His work and his words are a beacon for anyone seeking to bridge the gap between modernity and tradition, between the industrial and the organic.
Kamil’s ability to weave philosophy, environmentalism and personal accountability into a single narrative is striking. His message was clear: one’s work should aim not to change the world, an impossible feat, but to do what is right, no matter how small the action may seem.
In a world eager for simple solutions and grandiose promises, Kamil’s honest acknowledgment that “we may not change the world” is both humbling and liberating. It is not about rewriting history with sweeping gestures, but about living truthfully in the present and taking small, deliberate steps toward a future that reclaims nature. “Industrial processes,” he said, “are dangerous not only because they exploit natural elements but also because they produce far more than we truly need. When we market surplus as a virtue, we lose sight of the delicate balance between nature and our existence.”
Kamil’s ability to weave philosophy, environmentalism, and personal accountability into a single narrative is striking. His message was clear: one’s work should not aim to change the world, an impossible feat, but to do what is right, no matter how small the action may seem. “If you’re stuck in a hole,” he advised, “stop digging.” This simple metaphor, laden with the weight of years of introspection, encapsulated his lifelong quest to rediscover the essence of human need versus the endless greed that modernity often fosters.
In a society enamoured with the promise of a digital revolution and the allure of post-modern thought, which dismisses absolute truths in favour of subjective relativism, Kamil’s call for balance resonates deeply. He reminded us that while technological advancements continue to redefine our economic landscape, the core of human existence remains tethered to nature and community. His words are a rallying cry for the youth: use the digital medium to unearth the wisdom of indigenous cultures. He spoke of the Kalash, the native American tribes and the Australian aboriginal people who see themselves not as masters of nature, but as integral parts of it.
There is almost a poetic quality to Kamil’s narrative: a blend of sorrow for what has been lost, hope for what might yet be reclaimed and an unwavering commitment to living in harmony with the world. His journey is not one of lofty ideals or utopian dreams, but of practical wisdom grounded in a deep sense of responsibility.
Kamil Khan Mumtaz challenges the notion that one person, or one building, can revolutionise the world.
He urges us to focus on changing ourselves, on embracing our true needs rather than the manufactured desires of a consumerist society. As our conversation drew to a close, I couldn’t help but feel that I had witnessed not just the insights of a master architect but the heart of a visionary who has long grappled with the existential crises of our era.
The writer is a student and a climate change activist