In keeping with its penchant for writing – and reading – letters (or ciphers), the PTI says that former prime minister Imran Khan has penned an open letter to Chief of Army Staff (COAS) General Asim Munir. The letter apparently urges a review of policies and highlights what Imran sees as a growing chasm between the people and the military while also talking about alleged electoral rigging, judicial manipulation, media censorship, and the suppression of PTI members. Yet, while Imran frames his appeal as a call for unity, the letter seems to be more an attempt to once again woo the establishment – whether by gentle coaxing or less gentle pressure. Imran claims that the February 8 elections were rigged in collusion with what he describes as "money launderers", and that judicial independence has been compromised through the 26th Amendment. The former PM has also expressed concern – rightly so – over the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (Peca) amendments. In keeping with the PTI’s line, he has also criticised the judiciary for what he perceives as complicity in his continued imprisonment.
Unsurprisingly, the government has dismissed the letter as a political manoeuvre, accusing Imran of attempting to create divisions between the army and the people, labelling him either dangerously naive or deliberately provocative at a time of heightened security concerns. Security sources, meanwhile, have outright denied receiving the letter, saying that any political discussions should occur through established civilian channels and that the military has no interest in engaging with such overtures. The PTI, however, maintains that the letter was indeed sent, albeit through open channels such as journalists and social media. The problem for the PTI is not that it may or may not have sent a letter. The problem is that, having been seen as building his political career with the tacit backing of the powers-that-be, Imran Khan’s newfound desire to ask the establishment to ‘return to its constitutional role’ reads a bit off to many observers who have said time and again that, instead of seeing the unelected as the ultimate arbiter of political power in Pakistan, perhaps political players need to accord each other that same respect and value.
Whether the PTI letter is a genuine attempt at reconciliation, or an act of desperation from a leader running out of political options may not be revealed yet but it certainly seems to be part of a broader strategy to keep the party relevant and to force the powerful into reconsidering their stance. Regardless of the intent, Imran’s letter seems to say that true civilian supremacy remains elusive as of now. That said, and despite the self-serving nature of the PTI’s grievances, Imran’s concerns over electoral integrity, judicial independence and press freedom are issues that transcend party lines. Real change though will not come through open letters or public appeals to the military but via genuine political engagement, institutional reforms and an end to the cycle of confrontation that has long plagued Pakistani politics. For Imran Khan, the path forward lies not in coaxing or coercing the establishment but in acknowledging the civilian political framework. For the state, suppressing opposition voices will not resolve political instability. The country’s political stakeholders all need to start respecting each other enough to be able to sit in a room together – without chaperones.