Former president Donald Trump, who is seeking another shot at the presidency, faces a staggering 91 felony charges across multiple states.
His first trial, concerning the hush money case, was heard on Monday.
In an opinion piece published in USA Today on Sunday, Nicole Russell questions the response of Republicans to the allegations against Donald Trump. She asks what it would take to convince conservatives that Trump is unfit for office. She notes that some conservatives even downplay the seriousness of the accusations and view them as less significant compared to other potential crimes.
"Donald Trump, taking it one step further, has managed to do it in different states and has 91 felony charges against him. Trump faces his first trial in one of those cases Monday, the now infamous hush money case," she remarks.
"The question from Republicans shouldn't be “Is this all you got?” The question for us should be “What will it take to convince conservatives Trump isn’t fit for office?” she asserts.
Russell criticises the lowering of moral standards within the GOP, saying that accusations of hush money payments and falsified payoffs should not be dismissed lightly. She challenges Republicans to consider where they would draw the line and what would convince them that a candidate is unfit for office.
"That’s how bad things have gotten in the GOP. We’ve bargained so hard and lowered the standards so much that accusations of hush money to a porn star and falsified payoffs seem tame in comparison with – with what exactly? Tax fraud? State and federal election interference? Stealing classified documents and showing them to people without such clearance?" she asked.
"This raises two vital questions Republicans must answer. Where exactly is the bar? What exactly would convince us he’s unfit to represent us and unfit for office?"
Russell also addresses the conspiracy theory that the charges against Trump are part of a nationwide plot to tarnish his image. She dismisses this theory as implausible, pointing out the unlikelihood of every judge being involved in such a conspiracy.
Russell further points out the legal intricacies of the hush money case, including Michael Cohen's cooperation with prosecutors and the potential implications of linking the falsification of records to other crimes. She acknowledges that some may view the charges as minor in the grand scheme of things, but argues that they still reflect poorly on Trump's character and suitability for the presidency.
The article also raises broader questions about the moral standards within the Republican Party. Russell questions why accusations such as hush money payments and falsified records are being dismissed or seen as part of a conspiracy rather than concerning breaches of integrity.
Russell urges Republicans to reconsider their support for Trump and to reflect on whether he truly represents their values. She suggests that the party had alternative options, like Ron DeSantis, whose leadership qualities might have offered a more positive direction.
"Republicans had years to scout the land for a better man or woman to represent them. They came up with a few ideas and, entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy aside, they weren’t bad," she pointed out.
"We could have had Ron DeSantis and, sure, we’d just be talking about the governor's goofy shoes and how he makes people feel a little weird because he’s awkward. Meanwhile, Florida’s education is fantastic and its economy is booming, and he handles disasters and Disney as well as any conservative. But we can’t have that now because so many of you asked for Trump and his 91 felony charges."