Pakistan’s emphatic win against the reigning World Test Champions, South Africa, in Lahore marked not only a perfect beginning to their ICC World Test Championship (WTC) 2025-27 campaign but also a significant statement about their evolving identity in Test cricket. It was more than a victory; it was a declaration that Pakistan, when focused and composed, can still dominate world-class opponents, especially at home.

The Gaddafi Stadium bore witness to a contest that tested Pakistan’s temperament as much as its talent. The home side, having endured an indifferent previous WTC cycle, entered this one with renewed purpose and clarity. Under Shan Masood’s leadership, Pakistan defeated South Africa by a convincing margin after lunch on the fourth day, taking a 1-0 lead in the two-Test series. The win, achieved through a blend of disciplined spin bowling, tactical awareness, and flashes of brilliance with the bat, offered both relief and optimism to Pakistan’s fans.

Masood’s leadership has been defined by a clear tactical philosophy: prepare pitches that yield results, rely on batting discipline early, and let spinners dictate terms as the game progresses. The Lahore Test followed that script to perfection. Having won a crucial toss, Masood made full use of home advantage. Half-centuries from Imam-ul-Haq, Shan Masood, Mohammad Rizwan, and Agha Salman enabled Pakistan to post a solid first-innings total. South Africa, in reply, struggled to cope with turn and variable bounce, conceding a 109-run lead that proved decisive.

But beneath the euphoria lies an uneasy truth. This formula, effective though it may seem, remains dependent on factors beyond Pakistan’s control, particularly the toss. Had Aiden Markram called correctly on that first morning, the match could easily have followed a different trajectory. Pakistan’s success at home continues to hinge on conditions that suit their strengths and opponents’ weaknesses. While this pragmatic approach wins matches on familiar soil, it raises questions about sustainability abroad.

Despite the eventual dominance, Pakistan’s batting displayed familiar fragility. Twice in the match, the team stumbled from commanding positions into mini-collapses that exposed their mental lapses under pressure. From 199 for 2 in the first innings, Pakistan suddenly lost three wickets without adding a run. Later, after a promising partnership between Babar Azam and Saud Shakeel in the second innings, they collapsed again, losing six wickets for just 17 runs.

These weren’t mere statistical quirks; they reflected deeper issues of temperament and decision-making. Head coach Azhar Mahmood’s post-match comments about “shot selection and mental lapses” cut to the core of Pakistan’s recurring problem: the inability to consolidate advantage. Too often, promising innings are squandered by impulsive strokes, betraying a lack of tactical maturity. Saud Shakeel’s ill-timed aerial shot before tea, when Pakistan needed stability, was emblematic of this old weakness resurfacing in a new cycle.

Another glaring concern is Pakistan’s chronic inability to convert fifties into hundreds. Four batsmen reached half-centuries in the first innings, yet none went on to three figures. Imam fell seven short; Agha Salman, after constructing a valuable stand, also perished in the 90s. The pattern is familiar and troubling. It is not a question of skill, Pakistani batsmen clearly have the technique to get starts, but of mental endurance. Big innings win Test matches; Pakistan’s top order, for all its promise, continues to fall short of producing them consistently.

Babar Azam’s contribution, though steady, remains below expectations for a player of his calibre. Scores of 23 and 42 from Pakistan’s premier batter look respectable in isolation but underwhelm in context. His inability to convert promising starts into defining innings underscores the need for greater accountability at the top. For Pakistan to truly compete in the WTC, Babar must not only anchor but dominate.

If Pakistan’s batting raised questions, their bowling provided emphatic answers. On a surface that gradually broke down, Noman Ali’s ten-wicket haul stood as the decisive factor. Supported ably by the returning Shaheen Shah Afridi, who struck with both new and old ball, Pakistan’s attack dismantled South Africa with a combination of guile and aggression.

Shaheen Afridi’s late spell, four wickets in eleven balls, was a reminder that pace remains a potent weapon, even on spin-friendly tracks. His reverse swing not only wrapped up the match but also underscored the importance of balance in Pakistan’s bowling approach. While Masood’s reliance on spin paid dividends, Pakistan must resist the temptation to overdo it. Reducing pace to a supporting role risks blunting one of Pakistan’s traditional strengths, a weapon crucial for overseas tours where conditions won’t turn as sharply.

To their credit, South Africa fought hard despite adverse conditions. Senuran Muthusamy’s eleven wickets in the match were among the finest ever by a South African spinner, and the batting resistance shown by Rickelton and Brevis briefly ignited hope. Yet, Pakistan’s command over the match was never truly in doubt. The first-day partnership between Imam and Masood had already tilted the balance, ensuring that South Africa were always chasing the game.

The visitors’ struggle against spin revealed both their technical limitations and the psychological weight of playing from behind after losing the toss. In the end, Pakistan’s mastery of home conditions proved too much for even the reigning world champions.

sarfraznews12@gmail.com