Both Pakistan and Afghanistan can benefit from resolving the outstanding issues
T |
he relationship between Pakistan and Afghanistan has been, to put it mildly, an uneasy one. For decades, these neighbouring countries have been locked in a complex, often volatile embrace, a dance of conflict and uneasy truce. Think of it like a long, drawn-out family feud, with grievances passed down generations like heirlooms. Internal strife within each nation – insurgencies, power struggles – has frequently spilled across the border, igniting fresh flames. It’s a classic case of “my enemy’s enemy is my friend.” Here, the friends are constantly shifting alliances, leaving everyone perpetually on edge.
Pakistan has faced accusations of supporting certain Afghan groups hostile to the government in Kabul. Afghanistan, at various times, has provided sanctuary for militants targeting Pakistan. This appears to be a tit-for-tat game of geopolitical brinkmanship, a dangerous dance played out on a volatile stage. The recent violence has been more than a border skirmish; it is a deeply ingrained problem fuelled by a potent cocktail of mistrust and historical baggage.
Political instability, like a chronic cough, has plagued both nations. Frequent changes in leadership have made forging lasting diplomatic ties akin to building castles in the sand – beautiful, but easily washed away by the tide of political upheaval. Accusations of meddling in each other’s affairs fly back and forth like shuttlecocks, further poisoning the well of already strained relations. Border skirmishes, often resulting in costly casualties, are depressingly commonplace, adding fuel to the fire.
The Taliban’s ascension to power in Afghanistan in 2021 added another layer of complexity – a new wrinkle in an already deeply creased garment. While Pakistan initially expressed optimism, hoping for a return to stability, the hoped-for peace proved ephemeral. Recent months have witnessed a troubling upswing in deadly border clashes, escalating tensions to a fever pitch.
The consequences of the ongoing hostility are both violent and tragic. Lives have been lost, populations displaced and economic progress hampered. The conflict is a destabilising force across the wider region, fostering an environment ripe for the growth of terrorism and extremism. It is a grim picture, a stark reminder of the devastating human cost of unresolved conflict. Finding a lasting solution requires a monumental shift in perspectives, a willingness to engage in genuine dialogue and a commitment to building bridges instead of walls. The alternative is a continuation of this harrowing cycle of violence, a future nobody wants.
Political instability has plagued both nations. Frequent changes in leadership have made forging normal diplomatic ties akin to building castles in the sand – beautiful, but easily washed away by the tide of political upheaval.
There are whispers about Pakistan eyeing the Wakhan Corridor in Afghanistan. These rumours are clearly far-fetched. The idea clashes dramatically with Pakistan’s long-standing foreign policy and its current strategic priorities. It is like saying a marathon runner has suddenly decided to compete in a swimming race; it is completely out of character on several counts.
First, Pakistan’s foreign policy is staunchly against forcible border changes. This isn’t some secret; it has been a cornerstone of our diplomatic stances. The notion of Pakistan grabbing territory directly contradicts this fundamental principle. It is simply not in the playbook.
Second, consider the massive infrastructure projects Pakistan and China are undertaking at the Khunjerab Pass. They are not just slapping together a few roads; this is a significant investment designed to make the pass fully operational year-round, opening a major artery to Central Asia. If Pakistan wanted the Wakhan Corridor, wouldn’t they be investing in the Khunejrab instead? This investment speaks volumes about its priorities. It is a clear signal that the Khunjerab Pass is their chosen route to Central Asia.
Third, the Wakhan Corridor has a brutally challenging environment – remote, mountainous and incredibly difficult to access. Building transport infrastructure through it will be a monumental task, requiring a massive investment of time and resources. The Khunjerab Pass, on the other hand, offers readily available access and is already benefiting from ongoing development. Why would anybody choose an arduous path when a smooth one exists?
The suggestion that Pakistan wants the Wakhan Corridor lacks substance. It is inconsistent with its historical policies, strategic investments and plain logistical realities of the region.
However, the Pakistan-Afghanistan relationship is far from simple. The presence of the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan in Afghanistan casts a long shadow, fuelling terrorism and instability in Pakistan and impacting law and order problems.
Pakistan’s approach has been diplomatic; it has advocated for cooperation. However, the Afghan government’s response has often been hampered by tribal perspectives. There is a disconnect in the relationship; a lack of understanding. The Afghan government seems more focused on maintaining domestic popularity through occasional inflammatory rhetoric than on constructive dialogue with Pakistan. It is a case of prioritising short-term gain over long-term collaboration.
Both countries would benefit enormously from resolving these issues. Afghanistan needs help in areas like healthcare and education. Pakistan’s Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province is eager for trade. A collaborative approach wouldn’t just improve security and stability; it would also boost economic development and improve the lives of ordinary citizens on both sides of the border. It’s a win-win situation, if only they can find a way to bridge the chasm.
The writer is central information secretary of Awami National Party. He can be reached at anpspox@gmail.com