SC decision
This refers to the editorial ‘Interpreting 63A’ (May 18). It has discussed the verdict passed by the Supreme Court on the interpretation of Article 63A and said that defectors’ votes cannot be counted. The decision should have been retrospective. Unfortunately, the 1973 constitution is rife with ambiguities and has failed to answer simple questions; this is why we keep referring important issues to the Supreme Court.
Removing ambiguities is not rocket science, and it can be rectified within a few days. A party member’s vote is property of a political party because Pakistani voters vote for the party, not individual candidates. It seems that Hamza Shehbaz’s election has become null and void after this decision. Our legislators have had enough fun, and it is time they showed maturity and carried out electoral reforms without wasting time.
Mukhtar Ahmed
Karachi
-
Trump Trolls European Leaders With AI Map Showing Greenland As U.S. Territory -
AI Vs Reality: How Deepfakes Are Warping Story Of Maduro’s US Capture -
Why Ryan Coogler Got Worried After Pitching 'Sinners' To Michael B Jordan -
Princess Diana's Brother Shares Emotional Post After Prince Harry Returns To UK Without Meghan, Archie, Lilibet -
'Disgraced' Andrew Gets Away With Major Double Standard Over Royal Lodge -
Carson Beck Girlfriend Rumours Explained Amid CFP Championship Run -
Sean Penn's 'very Human Reality' Leaves Madonna Horrified -
Fernando Mendoza Girlfriend: Is The Indiana QB Dating Anyone? -
King Charles' Decision 'not Good Look' For Prince Harry Amid UK Court Case -
South Korea Announces First Set Of New Space Technologies -
Jimmy Butler: Warriors Star Awaits MRI Results After Knee Injury -
Blake Lively Gushes Over Ryan Reynolds Amid Feud With BFF Taylor Swift -
Prince William 'furious' At Meghan Markle, Harry -
Church Under Investigation After Anti-ICE Protest Interrupts Worship -
UK Govt Tightens School Rules On Phones And Social Media -
Fernando Mendoza’s Mom Steals Hearts After Indiana Wins National Championship